http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000386589
These people are not deep thinkers. There are ONLY two options:
1) Tie a part of what you pay for your education to the sort of jobs you are able to secure
in the future. So you pay a small fee up front to
enter into an educational program at a school, and then when you get employed, you pay based according to your means to be able to pay it back, at some very reasonable interest rate, adjusted for inflation [probably with some sort of yearly cap %]. This means schools also have
skin in the game in the trinity of student/educator/employer. Schools will then want the ability to fire you from educating you based on some objective criteria, which should also be the case. It also means that "Art History" programs are not likely to survive, at least tied to this model[ not that Art Historians aren't really smart - just that they often don't get high paying jobs, or better said, jobs tied to their education]
2) Simply make education very close to being free the way they do in almost all of the rest of the world. That is the
Social Contract that a state has with its people. Since education is a for profit
private sector endeavor in the US, this is not likely to happen.
There is no question that bankruptcy should dissolve a person from
all debt. Will people abuse it? For sure, just like Donald Trump does repeatedly:
https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/...dly-file-for-bankruptcy-and-still-stay-on-top
Please don't argue that corporations are not people. That will only ensnare you into something worse.