I said I believed you were trolling for responses.
You like to twist what people say to fit your narrative, don't you.
Be Afraid. Be Very Afraid.
- Thread starter JamesL
- Start date
I said I believed you were trolling for responses.
You like to twist what people say to fit your narrative, don't you.
And who would troll for responses other than a troll?
You lean toward passive-aggressiveness, don't you?
A troll is someone whose every post has no intent but to cause a flame war or hostility. All of us here troll for responses on occasion by posting something we know will inflame a particular individual or individuals into responding in anger. That's the difference.
As for passive-aggresssive behavior, I've always been a fan of sarcasm, at least. If that bothers you, I guess you could always put me on ignore. Frankly, I'm not sure I give a flying shit.
Wait, I'm sure.
You have to have everything explained in full detail to you, don't you?
Clarity of thought and expression is always a plus. Ranting feels good but doesn't accomplish much.
LOL, maybe. Actually, he makes a pretty good argument. Hillary is in bed with Wall Street and big corporations. Warren is kind of this Rand Paul/Ted Cruz figure from the extreme left who is not afraid to rock the boat. Plus she's younger and smarter than Hillary, more likeable and doesn't have Hillary's baggage from her sleazy days in Arkansas to Bill's scandals to Benghazi, etc.
How will Hillary respond in a debate to Warren pointing out that she got $200k for giving a short speech to universities? Will students lugging around huge loans like that? Or the Goldman speeches at mega bucks a pop? It is sleazy and everyone knows it.
Neither does making someone explain what is obvious.
You mean like the fact that TPs are wasting their time?
No, I was pretty much referring to you specifically, not your Tea Party fetish.