I've listened closely to Roger Ver debate various personalities and have come down on his side. I saw him flip a rude provocature off after the guy used the derogative term "Bcash", too many times. After I saw that, I sold my share of BTC for BCH, on principle, and haven't looked back.
I'm with Tibster here.
BCH is the most true to Satoshi's white paper, and BTC represents an alternative (alt coin)...but has somehow, in a less than honest process, absconded with the brand name.
I don't blame the Cash folks for pressing the name issue as far as possible. Good luck to the 600 rude litigants who want to bring statist force into the issue. I unsubscribe from any YouTuber who uses the "Bcash" abbreviation as unworthy of offering me any advice on any other nuanced issue (I don't need political lemmings as advisors).
The current health of BTC should never have been compromised/jeopardized for a future, faster L2 network, or to be an elite [expensive] store of value that forces use of an L2 network for transactions, which (L2) is still not viable or proven yet.