BBC WTC7 smoking gun... BBC jumps gun on reporting WTC7 collapse@!!!

Quote from neophyte321:



although impressive as your reference to Galileo is, I don't think his equation included the effect OF A JUMBO JET SPLITTING THE BUILDING IN HALF.


These building were far from over-built. Blathing foools ....



How do you know? What actual proof do you have to support that claim other than tautological reasoning?


"The Towers fell because they were under-engineered. And because they were under engineered, they collapsed!" DUH!
 
Quote from tradermaji:

WOW... no kidding!!!!!! :confused:

Was it really giant screw up or a cover up...

i have never seen google react so quickly and so quietly. they never once offered any reason whatsoever as to the reason for removal... and they almost always do that. it was quite a battle there for awhile.

i think their actions speak volumes as to who controls them and what their true purpose is. "do no evil" is a farce. they eventually lost and that video is forever in the public domain now.
 
Rat:
>i have never seen google react so quickly and so
>quietly. they never once offered any reason whatsoever
>as to the reason for removal

Copyrights? Threat of IP lawsuit?

JB
 
Quote from Turok:

Rat:
>i have never seen google react so quickly and so
>quietly. they never once offered any reason whatsoever
>as to the reason for removal

Copyrights? Threat of IP lawsuit?

JB

yeah... when they remove for those reasons they state so. digg also buried the story repeatedly even though it had the highest vote counts.

google was in talks with BBC but trust me.... they had a ton of other BBC stuff on before during and after so there is no way that was it. the clip was found in a public archive.
 
whats funny is that the BBC had recently put out a poorly done 9/11 hit piece. then this comes out.... too funny. talk about stooges, the producer even went on a local show and got ripped apart.
 
Back
Top