Battle over oil: Pelosi just opened the door to Bush Impeachment

Quote from ByLoSellHi:

Haroki, you are wrong about me. You assume way too much about what I intended. And I don't think it's for lack of clarity in what I wrote.

I never said anything about a 'NWO,' and never came close to insinuating that any such entity had any involvement in the Lewinsky scandal.

Do I believe it's possible, and maybe even likely, that the sexual trist between Lewinsky and Clinton wasn't a random, spontaneous act?

Sure. It's odd, to say the least, for someone in Lewinsky's lowly position to save a dress containing DNA matter, for as long as she did, unless she had an ulterior motive in her mind the very day the sexual encounter happened.

Does that make me a conspiracy theorist?

I don't think so. I just think it means I'm applying common sense to a bizarre set of circumstances, and that it would be less than healthy to be skeptical of Lewinsky's motives, and whether her actions were premeditated with something other than Clinton's sexual gratification in mind.

You want to call me conspiritorial? That's fine. I think you're naive, at a minimum.
More...

So how does her motives have anything to do with "powerful forces"?

Explain who these powerful forces are, if you don't mind.

Cuz the 2 seem to be at odds since she's nothing in the big picture....
 
Quote from Thunderdog:

Yes and no. Consider this outside possibility. Perhaps an eventual investigation into Bush's administration is inevitable. However, the damage has already been done. The question remaining is one of timing? Perhaps it's a carrot and stick thing, trying to keep in check a mad man in Office, at least for the remainder of his tenure. However, if he chooses to go on a rampage during his lame duck phase, then there is little utility in holding back the inevitable investigation.

Not that I necessarily buy into this theory, but hey.
More...

Well, you seem to be buying into SOME theory, at any rate.

What it is... is still pretty murky.

What I find most interesting about our exchange is the way you've avoided the facts I posted regarding Saddam's terrorist backing and their surrender conditions.

These are not in dispute, were one of the many of the reasons for wanting saddam out, and yet you (the royal you) concentrate on WMD's.

Just saying.....
 
Quote from Thunderdog:

Doesn't matter what I think. I'm Canadian. And even if I were an American, whether I accepted or rejected the conclusion of an impeachment investigation would be rather moot if, in fact, no such investigation were conducted. Wouldn't you say?
More...

Well, you obviously think that your opinion matters, otherwise you wouldn't be posting about it.

And no, it's not moot since you've been posting about it. Everyone's opinion matters Ka-boomdog. No one exists in a bubble.
 
Quote from Haroki:

Well, you seem to be buying into SOME theory, at any rate.

What it is... is still pretty murky.

What I find most interesting about our exchange is the way you've avoided the facts I posted regarding Saddam's terrorist backing and their surrender conditions.

These are not in dispute, were one of the many of the reasons for wanting saddam out, and yet you (the royal you) concentrate on WMD's.

Just saying.....
More...

YES! Why does everyone always forget that Saddam had drones ready to attack us from off our coastlines?? What is the matter with people?? They conveniently forget now the press conferences where we were told of the danger we were in!!

But we must not forget how he was threatening us - no matter how much the history revisionists would like.
 
Thanks for saving me the trouble, Doc.
:)

And it just serves as another example of "intelligence" being slanted at the pleasure of the President.
 
The vast majority of Dogmatics's on this board gets its information from one source and they think it's from the "burning bush."

Pitiful really.


Quote from Thunderdog:

Thanks for saving me the trouble, Doc.
:)

And it just serves as another example of "intelligence" being slanted at the pleasure of the President.
More...
 
Quote from ByLoSellHi:

Riiight.

An intern that takes a semen stained dress off, wraps it in plastic, without cleaning a speck of fabric, and saves it in her closet for years.

Sure. She wanted a souvenir from the White House to show to her grandchildren one day.

:cool:
More...
Yeah, there is just no way she could have thought that it may be useful down the road as evidence of some kind. CSI wasn't on then, was it?!?

Nah, some "powerful forces," i.e. Karl Rove, had to be behind it!

Had to!
 
Quote from Dr. Zhivodka:

The vast majority of Dogmatics's on this board gets its information from one source and they think it's from the "burning bush."

Pitiful really.
More...

What ever happened to common sense??

Think about it - why did we have to leave Afghanistan before we got bin Laden and his group? These were guys that killed thousands of our citizens on our own soil!!

It's because Saddam was ready to attack us! There was no time to waste - we had to pull our military out of the hunt for bin Laden so that we could stop Saddam from attacking us!!

He was an IMMINENT THREAT! Why are people's memories so bad now???
 
This post is so demonstrably stupid and uninformed that it has to be troll bait.

Sorry junior...I ain't playing that game.

Quote from MarketMasher:

What ever happened to common sense??

Think about it - why did we have to leave Afghanistan before we got bin Laden and his group? These were guys that killed thousands of our citizens on our own soil!!

It's because Saddam was ready to attack us! There was no time to waste - we had to pull our military out of the hunt for bin Laden so that we could stop Saddam from attacking us!!

He was an IMMINENT THREAT! Why are people's memories so bad now???
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top