barrons tries to expose cramer again

[Free Thinker]

http://online.barrons.com/article/SB123397107399659271.html?page=1

CNBC's evasiveness about Mad Money's performance can't be attributed to Cramer, since the network wouldn't let us talk to the star. We were scolded that we didn't understand the mind of a genius.

 

[condorll]

Quote from vhehn:

http://online.barrons.com/article/SB123397107399659271.html?page=1

CNBC's evasiveness about Mad Money's performance can't be attributed to Cramer, since the network wouldn't let us talk to the star. We were scolded that we didn't understand the mind of a genius.

I am no fan of Cramer, but should we do a poll as to who sucks more? Barrons or Cramer?

 

[Wayne Gibbous]

"OTHER CAREFUL, HONEST EXAMINATIONS of the CNBC star showed the same underperformance -- including several independent studies by finance researchers, and a 2007 review by Barron's that found the only way to reliably profit from Cramer's stock picks was to short them.."

 

[gaj]

all they need to do is show the results of his action alerts portfolio.

it's there in black and white - or rather, red, for the portfolio's losses - and it's what he always falls back on with his show..."i wouldn't own that, i'd own this which is in my action alerts portfolio".

 

[Renegen]

This goes right in the same folder as Fox Business trying to appear like it's fighting for the people and bringing forth investigative journalism. Both Barron's and Fox Business are owned by the same person, it's all just business, there's no sincere feelings behind it.