Barrack Obama's future: Disgrace and Exile

Quote from Range Rover:

This is typically what happens to a debate loser.Rather then talk about the subject of Russia selling weapons under Big Bad Bush that they stopped selling under Obama ,you want to criticize a statement that you felt wasn't specific enough and make childish insults.If that makes you feel better then admitting defeat so be it.

i tried to talk about it. i asked you a question and you responded with "this is what a defeated man sounds like". you never answered the question, and continue to avoid it. if you'd like to answer it, i'll talk with you on it.

though you clearly have no idea what you're talking about outside the cutting and pasting of articles from your best friend (google).

you should look up how debating is done. 95-99% of the content is not supposed to be an article or a new clipping. it's supposed to be your content with references. how can one have a meaningful discussion with Captain CTRL-V?
 
Grow up... this is a public board... you can't defend yourself or your libtarded views so you whine like the crybaby bitch that you are.
Quote from Range Rover:

My stalker has returned :(
 
Quote from BSAM:

Obama's future: Disgrace and Exile?

You mean kinda like Little George Bush's Disgrace and Exile?

Nope. George Bush completed 2 terms of office and is now touring the country with a book and media deal. He is a rock star by comparison.

Barrack Obama will more than likely be judged by history to be incredibly incompetent and destructive and will surely only have 1 term. One and Done.

Disgrace and Exile. This guy makes Carter look competent and popular.
 
This isn't about Bush you libtarded moron. That's about all you can do... bring up Bush and whine like the sissy crybaby that you are.
Quote from Range Rover:

blah, blah, blah, Bush blah, blah, blah, Bush blah, blah, blah Bush
 
Quote from Trader666:

This isn't about Bush you libtarded moron. That's about all you can do... bring up Bush and whine like the sissy crybaby that you are.


1zno8at.jpg
 
Quote from Tsing Tao:



you should look up how debating is done. 95-99% of the content is not supposed to be an article or a new clipping. it's supposed to be your content with references. how can one have a meaningful discussion with Captain CTRL-V?

My content was stating that Russia and China were being harder on Iran and N Korea under Obama then they where under Bush,the articles were my refrences
 
Quote from Tsing Tao:

so your score above is based on only the events in your inclusion? how convenient that must be. incidentally, the reactor was finished while obama was in office (he was unable to get them to stop).

just curious, what weapons did russia sell iran during the bush years? was it the same stuff the russians have been selling during the obama years? (helicopters, etc) because they still sell them, genius.

they may have canceled the advanced weapons , but the arms are still flowing. your statement "russia agrees to stop weapon sales" is not 100% accurate, is it.

The feared and respected tough guy Bush couldn't get them to do that




BTW,attack helicopters are part of the weapons Russia no longer sells to Iran(Under the leadership of President Obama)



"President Dmitry Medvedev signed a decree that prohibits "the transit across Russia, including by air, the removal from Russia to Iran, and the transfer to Iran outside Russia of any combat tanks, armored personnel carriers, large-caliber artillery systems, warplanes, attack helicopters, military vessels, missiles or missile systems as defined by the United Nations Register of Conventional Arms, S-300 surface-to-air missile systems, or materiel and spare parts used for all of the above.""
 
Back
Top