I agree. Also, the shoulders and arms tend to be disproportionately larger, as well as back thickness. (Although perhaps not necessarily back width to the same degree unless it's specifically trained for width; just guessing here, though.) Of course, these other "tells" are harder to see at the margin.Traps usually tell the story
I think the steroid look is decidedly more "bubbly" whereas the natural look is comparatively more angular. There may be exceptions to this generalization, but when you hear hoofbeats it usually pays to think horses rather than zebras.
Last edited:
