I wasn't aware that my response was overly argumentative. I apologize if I made you feel that way. Check some of my replies to Pabst if you want to see argumentativeQuote from TraderMojo:
By the way I'm not arguing with you, I'm just trying to understand your point of view. A simple yes or no would have sufficed.

The winner is a superior driver, but not necessarily because of innate (genetic) superiority.Quote from TraderMojo:
Can you give me an example of how to outperform someone else without being superior? Say for example if two people were in a car race, with exactly the same cars. How would one go about consistently outperforming the other without being superior?
Forgive me... I have changed my approach here at ET and do not get involved in these discussions even though you may be a competent dialectician. Look at American culture today and compare it to Asian culture. What about one culture would tend to result in disparate performance?Quote from TraderMojo:
What about the culture do you hypothesize would lead one culture to outperform another, all other things being equal?
Sure, you could say that. That's almost certainly a part of it.Quote from TraderMojo:
So, perhaps your anecdotal evidence suggest that this group have better discipline than other groups? Is that it? They are better disciplined and more focused. Could one say that they have superior discipline and focus?
Forgive me for not engaging you further on this. It is a fascinating topic of discussion but not one that can be explored here (at least without battling inordinate amounts of noise).
