Quote from nkhoi:
that was a fine argument but it based on premiss that Jack bring no value whatsoever, of that I disagree.
Quote from bundlemaker:
Baron, you truly are an idiot. Read above what you wrote. You state specifically that you ban those you receive complaints about. Think about that for a moment. It makes NO sense. You're assuming that if you receive complaints, the complainers must be right. YOu've turned YOUR board, which you supposedly control, into some kind of quasi-democracy, controlled by "complainers". YOu've relinquished your total control and given it over to anyone and everyone who is short on brain cells.
Now I understand why, LOL.
Quote from blackguard:
excellent points.
Quote from dbphoenix:
Hardly what I'd call "excellent". If somebody gets banned and no reason is given, the peanut gallery whines. If a reason is given, the peanut gallery whines (the reason's not good enough). Therefore, the only alternative is never to ban anybody. But the peanut gallery whines about that as well.
Fact is that Jack's supporters are largely responsible for this situation since not one of them was willing to lift a finger to defuse the situation. Not one. Instead, they more often just fed the fire.