Quote from bearmountain:
oh, I wouldn't mention bar by bar book to wrbtrader or Gabfly1. Just the mention of Al Brooks name sets their hair on fire.
That's a little misleading considering I've never read the book and I'm only getting information about the book from those that have actually read the book.
The fact is I questioned you and a few others (e.g. NoDoji) about one specific detailed you and others had mentioned involving the use of indicators that was in contrast to others that are using Al's method and have read the book. You guys said Al Brooks does NOT use indicators. Yet, others said he does use an indicator. Therefore, I asked you, NoDoji and a few others for
clarification if the guy used indicators.
The reply was "he does not". However, I get a private message from someone that saids he uses Al Brooks method and Al Brooks does use an indicator. Then I get another message from someone that uses Al Brooks method and saids he does use an indicator.
That prompt me to asked NoDoji a more specific question. I then asked if there's anything on Al's charts besides just price. The pause and reply was there was. I asked what it was that Al puts on his charts and the reply was "price moving average". I then responded that "he does use indicators". The reply I was then given from NoDoji was that he doesn't consider "moving averages" as an indicator.

The next reply I received from NoDoji and a few others was that the use of
one moving average is ONLY as a
"visual aid or to help put the price action within a framework".
My reply was the following...
Can you trade without the "moving average indicator" and still say you're using Al Brooks method?
I didn't get a response to that question.
The point I'm making is that there's a
growing list of traders the past few years that
only use one indicator and call themselves "price action traders". Their usual explanation is that their use of the indicator or any other indicator really is only for
"visual aid or to help put the price action within a framework" they see on their charts and that it has no impact on the trade decision itself.
*****
My argument is that if your trade decision is dependent upon using an indicator...you shouldn't promote yourself as a "price action trader" and you obviously shouldn't continue bashing the use of indicators.
*****
This is the same argument I have with those that don't believe in TA even though they use charts with just price and nothing else to help them to make trade decisions. I won't mentioned their names here at ET but they use the same excuse...they're only using charts for a
"visual aid and that it has no impact on their trade decisions" and they strongly do not believe it's technical analysis...charts with volume or charts with a few trendlines or charts with a few key price levels being watched or charts for comparison to another chart or charts with fundamentals info annotated on the charts...whatever.
If such was true...they should be able to make their trade decision without opening and then viewing any charts. If they can't...they are using technical analysis. Therefore, via the same logic, if Al Brooks or someone using his method can make trade decisions without a "moving average" on the chart...they are a price action trader.
Yet, if they can not make that trade decision without the indicator...that's
OK but don't run around bashing the use of indicators similar to those running around ET bashing the use of TA while using charts.
What prompt this discussion?
There was a prior thread here at ET where someone had layered his charts with about 10 price moving averages, a moving average on the volume histogram and some color coded variable on the bar chart itself...
Yet, he strongly believed he wasn't using indicators while openly bashing the use of indicators. It's ok guys or gals...nothing shameful about admitting you're still using indicators or technical analysis especially if you're profitable. Just don't reply to me that it's "only for a visual aid" while bashing indicators or TA.
Mark