I was -- am -- the OP of this thread and somewhere along the line I expressed the hope that Al's next book would be written in English. His articles are better written and he has written three more books the first of which is scheduled for release in April.
I have benefited from his book, his articles and his daily webinars. I can't defend the writing in the book. I do not understand not having a qualified editor to make sure it is readable but, that said, i hope he keeps writing and teaching. I think he's a good guy willing, even eager, to share real trading insights.
I have benefited from his book, his articles and his daily webinars. I can't defend the writing in the book. I do not understand not having a qualified editor to make sure it is readable but, that said, i hope he keeps writing and teaching. I think he's a good guy willing, even eager, to share real trading insights.
Quote from Gabfly1:
So what you are suggesting is that just about everything is a setup. Unless it isn't, in which case it wouldn't be.
Some people have opined that it is because Al Brooks is "so scientific" that they have difficulty following his text. I beg to differ. Not being able to herd the cats in one's head does not exactly make someone "scientific." In fact, I am more inclined to believe that if Brooks did indeed have a scientific predisposition, then he would be somewhat more systematized in either his approach or his presentation, and preferably both. Instead, he comes across as a misunderstood artiste.
