And.....drum roll please....
She still lost!
That was not your point, your majority has a numbers issue.
And she lost AFTER the criminal Russian collusion and Comey's letter by a very small margin, how is that majority of the country?
And.....drum roll please....
She still lost!
Maybe this is why she lost
Political portfolio risk? 1:37 PM ET Mon, 23 May 2016 | 03:22
Hillary Clinton has been Wall Street's presidential darling so far by a large margin, but could be about to face some competition.
In her quest to be the nation's 45th president, the Democratic front-runner has taken in a stunning haul from the finance industry — just shy of $27 million and counting, according to the latest filings as analyzed by OpenSecrets.org. The New York metro area specifically has contributed $40.9 million of the total $204.3 million she has raised.
One of the reasons Clinton has been able to stockpile so much Wall Street cash is that she has no competition in that regard. Her lone remaining challenger, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, has forsworn Wall Street cash and has taken no money from the finance industry. Sanders has launched withering criticism at Clinton, calling her a pawn of Wall Street power brokers for accepting lucrative speaking fees as well as campaign donations.
On the Republican side, presumptive nominee Donald Trump has raised a meager $283,040 of his $57.7 million total from finance.
The inauguration happens AFTER the election.
What happened before the election?
Donald Trump happened.
Bwhahahahahahahahahaha
Can't wait for 2020.
Unlike all those Goldman guys sitting in the Whitehouse right now.
And speaking of drones vs thinkers: didn't Trump go to UPenn and didn't Bannon go to Harvard?
Of course he will say the left needs a Breitbart: an organization that pretends to be news but really just spouts a narrative that most of the nation rejects. Bannon is like a terrorist. He has little to lose and a lot to gain by creating chaos. He needs more terrorists like him on the other side to justify his existence.
The majority in 30 of the 50 states in the USA, voted for Trump.
The "Breitbart News Network" is a form of anti-wisdom making stupid people even more stupid (Fox, CNN a bit too). It often preys on the thinning synapses of elderly also who start to become literally minded. That is why con-men focus on the elderly, even if once sensible they are more easily manipulated.
"Reich wingers", Americans of German and Austrian (Japanese, there is one asshole anyway) ancestry who try to re-litigate WWII and re-frame the fascists as not that bad / really just into protecting their race etc. etc, would be better deported before Latinos. These guys seem particularly attracted to Breitbart.
Many tens of millions died, several of my family died winning that war. Like the South they lost, boo-the-fuck-who that these creeps don't like modern Germany and want a different history that suits their fantasy better.
Bannon finds a helluvalot of his thoughts in the writings of fascist monsters.
This trickle, now a stream of fascism-ain't-so-bad will get larger over the decade ahead if people don't cry bullshit loudly and proudly, "this machine kills fascists".