Is anyone baffled by the weakness in the banks and the shrug by the rest of the market?
Does the market assume the fed is on it?
Does the market assume the fed is on it?
Quote from JamesVU2000:
Is anyone baffled by the weakness in the banks and the shrug by the rest of the market?
Does the market assume the fed is on it?
Quote from JamesVU2000:
Is anyone baffled by the weakness in the banks and the shrug by the rest of the market?
Does the market assume the fed is on it?
(http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/06/20/13939/capitulation-in-banking/)Over the past seven weeks, the BKX Bank Index is down 26%, and bank stocks now appear to be in capitulation mode, which means they could trade below fair value in the near-term as 1) emotion, 2) very high credit risk, 3) more dividend cuts and capital raises, and 4) a very uncertain earnings outlook all weigh on bank prices. Still, as more large banks cut dividends, raise capital, and significantly (and more realistically) increase their credit loss and reserve building assumptions (similar to WB, NCC, KEY & FITB), we should get closer to fully discounting the credit cycle in bank stock prices and commencing a sustainable price recovery.
Quote from piezoe:
I mean once a stock has dropped 80-90% from its high it's pretty much got to be at a bottom, by definition, unless of course it is going to zero.
Quote from m22au:
I disagree - a $100 stock that declines 90% to $10 can still lose another 50% from there, and yet be "only" 95% down from $100.
Someone who tried to pick the bottom at $10 is then sitting on a 50% loss.