Banks have no standing to take away a persons home

Quote from nutmeg:

Charney has held seminars in Ohio, Oregon, South Carolina and throughout Florida to educate lawyers on how to implement the courtroom defense.
. . .

She is scheduled to make hold her first New York seminar next month.

There you go. She makes money by giving seminars - a lot like these dorks who go around saying you don't have to pay your income tax. If this were genuine and widespread, it would have been front page news. I know I would have heard about it, I'm in the biz. This either isn't widespread, is relatively easy to correct or is complete bullcrap.

But don't take my word for it. Just stop paying your mortgage, give her a call and see what happens. :D :D :D
 
Spoken like one who has a personal interest in freeloaders and deadbeats skating on their obligations. :p
Quote from nutmeg:

We are a nation of laws, if the law benefits the freeloader and deadbeat, they haven't broken the law.
 
Quote from Trader666:

Only in America.

First, it's not "someone's home" until they pay for it. So deadbeat occupier does not equal homeowner.

Second, only in America would an army of lawyers rush to help deadbeats and freeloaders.

I can hear the commercials now "You deserve to keep your home even if you haven't been paying the mortgage... "

This is how it should be done:
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2313077&#post2313077

Exactly!

Lawyers don't care how creative they have to get to get paid. I wonder how many of these cases will be won. If it's a significant amount, mortgages will be very hard to come by indeed in the future because they will obviously be more risky.
 
Quote from nutmeg:

Second, only in America would an army of lawyers rush to help deadbeats and freeloaders.

-------------------------------

Tut tut..

We are a nation of laws, if the law benefits the freeloader and deadbeat, they haven't broken the law. Congress writes sloppy laws.
[/QUOTE

I think you're being sarcastic, Nutmeg.

But there's a difference between laws and legislation. We were once a nation that upheld rule of law and we are now a nation moving toward arbitrary law - not unlike totalitarian states. We were once a nation of laws and we won't be soon.
 
Very true... notice there have been few if any legal repercussions for those who fraudulently obtained loans for example... instead we're going to bail some out.

If I had my way we'd put the scum who defaulted due to fraud or bad decisions in debtors' prison and make them do the menial work we outsource to China.

Personal responsibility is an anachronism these days.
Quote from Angrycat:

We were once a nation that upheld rule of law and we are now a nation moving toward arbitrary law - not unlike totalitarian states. We were once a nation of laws and we won't be soon.
 
Back
Top