Originally posted by darkhorse
I don't understand why the theory of 'unlimited' short risk isn't put to bed. Its a cliche, a broker's excuse for not knowing how to short.
'Theoretically' you could lose your entire net worth in a casino too, if you never had the sense to use a mental stop.
Which has a higher probability: a $2 stock gapping up to $20, or a $20 stock gapping down to $2?
Given the current environment, I would say the second scenario is about a thousand times more likely. [/QUOTE
i agree; it's harder to make 900% than to lose 90% ( in this enviroment)