Specifically, you said:
"It shows that there is a genetic ability to understand banking."
It's true - your statement means that there are people (in your mind, you), who are genetically predisposed to understand banking (persumeably better than the rest of us).
That statement, however, is just about as insane as saying that only people with such abilities can understand banking.
Again, both are completely absurd statements. It almost doesn't matter which shade of it you meant.
"It shows that there is a genetic ability to understand banking."
It's true - your statement means that there are people (in your mind, you), who are genetically predisposed to understand banking (persumeably better than the rest of us).
That statement, however, is just about as insane as saying that only people with such abilities can understand banking.
Again, both are completely absurd statements. It almost doesn't matter which shade of it you meant.
Quote from morganist:
No re read the posts above I said that there is a genetic pre disposition. I specifically said that others can learn but they might not one have the advantages of natural skills in that area which help and two they might not have a interest in the subject and get drawn to it which is in my opinion pre disposed too.
Please re read this I specifically put this in those posts because I knew that people would contest it.