Quote from indahook:
No I dont.
Check your state or federal laws for further clarification. They are all there in writing. And already in existence for you to peruse.
I`m not the one who started a thread about stripping somebody the right to own a legal firearem because they personally think its too much. Who are YOU to assume anything is too much?
You are one funny dude...arguing about legal personal rights.
Quote from killthesunshine:
Firearm laws just don't come into existence out of nowhere. Someone must decide what should be banned and WHO should be excluded from ownership. Your LOCAL laws are made by YOU and people like you. And here you are wanting the laxest interpretation of gun ownership allowed by law but you don't want to get your hands "dirty" when the hard questions are asked of what and who should be stripped ! :eek:
Quote from indahook:
Are you a US citizen? If you are then you know the jobs been done already. The laws exist defining who can or cannot own guns. My opinion stands. If you are not a lawbreaker..you get to own whatever you want. You have earned that right. And vice versa.
Snce you`re the thug who wants to strip law abiding citizens the lawful right to own firearms that hold more than one shot at a time why dont you share your infinite wisdom with us?
Quote from killthesunshine:
so, you agree with the EXISTING law as it stands? FULL auto should be unavailable to all law abiders and law breakers alike?
since you are a "law abider" and "up standing" citizen you MUST agree with the law, right?
Quote from killthesunshine:
i don't know what hill your living on but if you own a sub machine gun your a law breaker
Private ownership of submachine guns is illegal in most nation!
I'm living on a hill in the US. Where full autos manufactured before 1986 can be legal with the right license.Quote from killthesunshine:
i don't know what hill your living on but if you own a sub machine gun your a law breaker
Private ownership of submachine guns is illegal in most nation!