Restricting access DOES restrict access to all but the most ardent criminal.
Why do you NEED a semi-auto rifle for protection?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
BAN semi-automatic weapons
- Thread starter killthesunshine
- Start date
Restricting access DOES restrict access to all but the most ardent criminal.
Why do you NEED a semi-auto rifle for protection?
FredBloggs
Guest
if youre going to commit a robbery, youre more likely to carry a gun if you think your victim is armed. also, youre more likely to fire first.
i think you need to address the problems in society that makes a kid go out and feel the need to rob in the first place. a tall order i know.
in europe where it is illegal to carry guns (and knives) we have less gun crime. its that simple. we do have gun crime, but less than usa. a lot less. however, like the usa, the gun crime we do have is often the result of hard drug addiction and the gangs that surround that culture.
i think you need to address the problems in society that makes a kid go out and feel the need to rob in the first place. a tall order i know.
in europe where it is illegal to carry guns (and knives) we have less gun crime. its that simple. we do have gun crime, but less than usa. a lot less. however, like the usa, the gun crime we do have is often the result of hard drug addiction and the gangs that surround that culture.
Quote from killthesunshine:
Perfect example of why semi-automatic weapons should be banned.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100224/ap_on_re_us/us_colo_school_shooting
Agreed?
Nope. And I will take it a step further and state that you should be allowed to go FULLY AUTO.
Quote from killthesunshine:
Perfect example of why semi-automatic weapons should be banned.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100224/ap_on_re_us/us_colo_school_shooting
Agreed?
GUN CONTROL: The theory that a woman lying dead in an alley is morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got shot.
FredBloggs
Guest
FredBloggs
Guest
Quote from tomdavis:
GUN CONTROL: The theory that a woman lying dead in an alley is morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got shot.
an interesting point that i am inclined to agree with.
an eye for an eye - just like the bible says. usa is a very protestant country after all.
as ghandi said: in the land of eye-for-an-eye, everybody ends up blind.
Quote from rcaldwell:
Nope. And I will take it a step further and state that you should be allowed to go FULLY AUTO.
May I also purchase a tank and a fighter jet if I can afford it? After all, it is my right to protect myself! I need such powerful weapons or else the criminals will be the only ones who have them!
Quote from indahook:
Take notice where these tragedies occur. Malls, schools and other places that do not allow the law abiding citizen to protect themselves. If this loonie started walking down a public street CO and took one shot he would have been tapped like the fucking wild animal is.
Banning firearms would do nothing to stop the insane or criminal element. All it would do is create a free for all of crime.
Take a look at DC where nobody but the cops are allowed to protect themselves. The stats dont lie.
+1.
Long live the 2nd Amendment.