Bad day for the Democrats

As you should know the huffington post isn't held to any standard of truth from a legal standpoint, hence, they can be sued but can't be held liable.

There it is, now you are educated.





Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

How many lawsuits against National Enquirer for false claims compared to lawsuits against HuffPo?

LOL.

You ain't too bright....

Probably get all your "news" from Fox and National Enquirer.

Too freakin' funny...
More...
 
Of course they can be sued if they make false libelous claims...

HuffPo like Drudge links to stories for which they are not responsible, but they also publish blogs and they have their own commentary. They are not shielded from a lawsuit or an injunction.

They can be sued, they can be enjoined not to publish something.

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=5406538&page=1

To suggest they can't be sued is outright ignorance.

You really are aren't too bright...typical for a right winger though.

Quote from John_Wensink:

As you should know the huffington post isn't held to any standard of truth from a legal standpoint, hence, they can be sued but can't be held liable.

There it is, now you are educated.
More...
 
The paper is not the same as the 60,'s "I chopped up my mother and sprinkled her on my salad" stuff.

They break real stories. I would never read it, but I know folks that ran it. They broke the Marla Maples romp with her bodyguard. Trump tried to have the story blocked. Tom Arnold bitched and moaned that they got pictures of his wedding illegally. He sold the rights so he could pay for the wedding. All kinds of cool stories. You can believe the Edwards stuff.
 
What, the National Enquirer can't afford video cameras?

LOL!

Why not just post the videos taken by the reporter who "saw" all of this happen...

Quote from flytiger:

The paper is not the same as the 60,'s "I chopped up my mother and sprinkled her on my salad" stuff.

They break real stories. I would never read it, but I know folks that ran it. They broke the Marla Maples romp with her bodyguard. Trump tried to have the story blocked. Tom Arnold bitched and moaned that they got pictures of his wedding illegally. He sold the rights so he could pay for the wedding. All kinds of cool stories. You can believe the Edwards stuff.
More...
 
I have to admit zzz did study up on the law.

He used to be ignorant of how the law worked and if a remember looked quite foolish.

Then he wrote stuff that was kind of correct.

Now he writes with the arrogance of a law professor.

He is a fairly quick study.
 
Quote from jem:

I have to admit zzz did study up on the law.

He used to be ignorant of how the law worked and if a remember looked quite foolish.

Then he wrote stuff that was kind of correct.

Now he writes with the arrogance of a law professor.

He is a fairly quick study.
More...
Other than the fact that he's an asshole, a hypocrite, a troll, obfuscator supreme, and an alcoholic who thinks pedophilia is a laughing matter, he's probably an ok guy.

Just not the kind you'd want to ever associate with in the real world.
 
I would say it's as illegal or likely as the Mayor of San Francisco being prosecuted for breaking federal law by harboring fugutives right?



Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Of course they can be sued if they make false libelous claims...

HuffPo like Drudge links to stories for which they are not responsible, but they also publish blogs and they have their own commentary. They are not shielded from a lawsuit or an injunction.

They can be sued, they can be enjoined not to publish something.

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=5406538&page=1

To suggest they can't be sued is outright ignorance.

You really are aren't too bright...typical for a right winger though.
More...
 
Well well, well, the pretty boy abmits dipping his stick into another chick while wifey is fighting for her life. Hell of a guy. Was he paying this broad hush money? Seems so, as his campaign had her hired as a high priced web developer. He's done!
 
Quote from CaptainObvious:

Well well, well, the pretty boy abmits dipping his stick into another chick while wifey is fighting for her life. Hell of a guy. Was he paying this broad hush money? Seems so, as his campaign had her hired as a high priced web developer. He's done!
More...
Edit: There is some good news. At least he was screwing a woman and not some homo.:eek: :eek: :eek:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top