Bad Catalyst: If Trump Impeached

tommcginnis said:
I would wager "Nary a hiccup."

The market CRASHED when Agent Orange was elected, right up until they realized that there would be unified houses + executive branch, to guarantee tax relief and regulatory reform. That happened at about 3:20am, as I recall it. And BOY oh boy did the buyers come in.

BUT IT WAS NOT TRUMP, it was tax reform.

AND TAX REFORM PASSED. So, "Trumpidiot?" He's yesterday's news. Yesterday was historic: his lawyer testified that he'd performed felony acts with the foreknowledge and at the behest of his employer. AND THE MARKET DIDN'T BUDGE.

That's it.

If either house switches, there will be a downturn, until the market remembers that 1-party democracies are associated with decreased returns, and that non-unified branches tend to produce either *gridlock*, or crisis-responding, legislation. (Meaning: it gets out of the way of business.) We have had our period of *needing* unified government: it has lasted 18 months. By the time we hit the 2year mark???? We'll be better off with a split government. (And the market will know this, and do another Election Night V-bottom: cry "Eeek! Eeek!" and plunge down, and the rip around, straight up, and way past where it started.

TRUMPIDIAN IMPEACHMENT?? NO EFFECT.

((BTW??? Have your passport in good order. If Mother Pence and her hubby end up in de Casa Blanca?? That'd be a great time to scoot.))
More...
What felony acts? Please elaborate. LAW only please; not opinion.
 
HeSaidSheSaid said:
would it put a nail on the coffin of this 10 year bull market?

Election night Nov 8, 2017, DJI popped 11% from 18000 to 20K. Would it drop that much if Trump were to be impeached?

a possible scenario: Republican would lose the house in the Nov election, then Trump would be impeached by the house, market tanked -10% percent, then the Senate acquitted him, then the markets would resume.
More...
On what grounds should President Trump get "impeached'?
 
motif said:
What felony acts? Please elaborate. LAW only please; not opinion.
More...

The ones to which his lawyer plead guilty? And about which he testified? :wtf: "HAS GOT GOOGLE?" :rolleyes:

Whatever you think you're digging -- right now it looks like a hole. o_O
Do some homework, think for yourself.:cool:
 
tommcginnis said:
The ones to which his lawyer plead guilty? And about which he testified? :wtf: "HAS GOT GOOGLE?" :rolleyes:

Whatever you think you're digging -- right now it looks like a hole. o_O
Do some homework, think for yourself.:cool:
More...
I do think for myself. That's why I'm not a card-carrying member of the Nihilism party(Democrats).

Cohen pleading guilty to tax evasion is not going to get President Trump impeached.

Not even close.
 
tommcginnis said:
I would wager "Nary a hiccup."

The market CRASHED when Agent Orange was elected, right up until they realized that there would be unified houses + executive branch, to guarantee tax relief and regulatory reform. That happened at about 3:20am, as I recall it. And BOY oh boy did the buyers come in.

BUT IT WAS NOT TRUMP, it was tax reform.

AND TAX REFORM PASSED. So, "Trumpidiot?" He's yesterday's news. Yesterday was historic: his lawyer testified that he'd performed felony acts with the foreknowledge and at the behest of his employer. AND THE MARKET DIDN'T BUDGE.

That's it.

If either house switches, there will be a downturn, until the market remembers that 1-party democracies are associated with decreased returns, and that non-unified branches tend to produce either *gridlock*, or crisis-responding, legislation. (Meaning: it gets out of the way of business.) We have had our period of *needing* unified government: it has lasted 18 months. By the time we hit the 2year mark???? We'll be better off with a split government. (And the market will know this, and do another Election Night V-bottom: cry "Eeek! Eeek!" and plunge down, and the rip around, straight up, and way past where it started.

TRUMPIDIAN IMPEACHMENT?? NO EFFECT.

((BTW??? Have your passport in good order. If Mother Pence and her hubby end up in de Casa Blanca?? That'd be a great time to scoot.))
More...
The real "collusion"

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
    • April 23, 2015
"As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well."

"And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock."

A check from Vladimir Putin to Hillary Clinton in 2015 for 500,000 big ones.

You can't make this up.
 
motif said:
I do think for myself. That's why I'm not a card-carrying member of the Nihilism party(Democrats).

Cohen pleading guilty to tax evasion is not going to get President Trump impeached.

Not even close.
More...

Democrats == Nihilism??? That's a laugh. Not as a statement about the ninny-nannies of Jefferson's Party, but that you missed what Bitch McCONNell did to my Party Of Lincoln 10 years ago. THAT was nihilism. Direct and by definition. Your grasp on history is...... poor.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top