Just wondering what kind of research and statistics has already been done on this already?
You only need to go to Google search and you can find all (thousands) of research and people that does statistical analysis on chart patterns.
http://www.google.com
You'll then learn that each researcher, each statistical analysis is via the interpretation of what the pattern is by the person. In other words, there's a reason why each have different results in comparison to the next researcher for the "same pattern". It's because they each see the pattern differently and their trade strategy that's going to be tested is based upon their interpretation of the objective rules involving that pattern. Simply, objective rules as inputs but subjective on what those rules are and subjective in the application.
That's why people say patterns are
subjective because each researcher is
not using the same rules nor are they applying it the same. I once pointed out this flaw in academics of TA in a comparison of 10 different research papers on Japanese Candlestick Patterns on the exact
same data.
They all had different results only because they
trade differently and many had different interpretations for the objective rules of the candlestick patterns.
That's why if you're going to put value on someone's "research" or "statistical analysis"...at least be smart about it and contact the person and then ask for in-depth details of the trade strategy that was used in the research or statistical analysis.
That's what I did and I discover some of those strategies was downright scary and I just couldn't imagine someone using such in real money trading.