Quote from jacksmith:
One common story I had heard about trading system is that,
Successfully backtest for 3 year's data, yet the system blows up in 3 days,
what causes this ?
Thanks.
Part of the problem, especially for HFT, automated systems, and scalpers, IMO is that you can't realistically backtest fills.Quote from jacksmith:
One common story I had heard about trading system is that,
Successfully backtest for 3 year's data, yet the system blows up in 3 days,
what causes this ?
Thanks.

Quote from CyborgTrading:
Part of the problem, especially for HFT, automated systems, and scalpers, IMO is that you can't realistically backtest fills.
One solution that you may want to have a look at is Cyborg Trading's forward testing sim environment.
A Sterling Demo account can not help you forward test because it's fill engine is not realistic either. Anyone who has used it knows what I mean
It is just a small part of what Cyborg Does but it may help with this particular issue.
here's a link.
http://cyborgtrading.com/solutions/simulation
Forward test until your green and that should give you some confidence to go live.
We believe that fills are what trading is all about.
Quote from iuykcif:
Why, in particular, do you fill that for automated systems you can't realistically backtest fills ?
I do not have the same perception. Clearly a simulated fill may differ in several ways from a real fill (partial fills, slippage, latency, etc) but usually this is not something that prevents from determining at backtest time if a strategy will be robust and profitable.
Especially working with very liquid instruments.
Rather, I see the problem in the strategy itself, which can be more prone to overfitting (like signal based strategies) or unsuitable definition of performance stats or leaky filtering system, etc.
____________________
Tom
My <a href="http://www.datatime.eu/public/gbot/2009Oct19/default.htm" target="_blank">auto trading</a> journal
Quote from CyborgTrading:
Yeah, your definitely right. For a lot of traders unrealistic fills is not a huge problem.
Realistic fills become more and more important as the time frame of your trade becomes less and less.
Do you use Sterling Trade Pro?
Quote from iuykcif:
Right, with a small time frame it's crucial to work with liquid instruments.
Sterling Trade Pro: I did not know it I just browsed it on the internet. Is it good?
I am with IB, and i write all the software I need, when a need arises. (I enjoy reinventing all the wheels for personal achievement, deeper understanding and full control).
Tom
Quote from CyborgTrading:
Yeah Sterling is good. It's one of a few platforms that are made specifically for prop traders. Sterling is very similar to anvil, prosper pro, laser.
I only mention it because it is the equities platform that Cyborg Trading currently connects to, although we will soon be releasing on genesis.
If you want to see a bit more of what we do pm me, or check out our site http://www.cyborgtrading.com