Chris Cole mentions "never hedge a non linear product with a linear product." Whats the intuition behind this? If i am short a strangle and my delta risk increases, is there a problem with using the underlying to hedge? I understand i will still have gamma and vega risk but isnt using the linearity of the underlying the best way to hedge the delta risk?
Also, he does not run a tail risk fund but rather a long vol fund and states there is big difference between the two. CBOE tracks two indexes. The first being a tail hedged index and the other a long vol index (Chris Cole's fund is part of this). The long vol index has a positive carry vs the tail hedged index which doesn't. Does anyone know where one can find examples of some of these long vol funds methodologies?
I think it's all semantics...long vol or long tails. Spitznagel does exactly what Cole does, sell ATM options in the near term to finance the long tails further out. There maybe a marketing benefit to calling yourself a long tail fund as your expected annual returns most likely will be negative and you can get away with that vs saying you are long vol. There is a tail ETF called appropriately "TAIL", where you can track some version of the strategy. It lost about 5% over the past 12 months while the S&P 500 was up 12%. The short stock ETF "HEDGE" was down about 6.5% over the same period.