What is going on now has nothing to do with the bill.
It is all about behinds the scenes horsetrading.
The Democrats were not rushed into passing this bill on a partisan basis which would have been a Republican dream scenario. Reid and Pelosi siding with Bush while most House Republicans not only opposing the Democrats but their own President.
Pelosi says she wants at least 80 Republican House members to support the Bill before she brings to the floor and tells her troops to vote for it. She might settle for as little as 40, but under that she wants no part of it.
Well, there are some Democrats who might even be committing political suicide if they vote for this bill.
So what is going on now, is for leadership to decide who will be permitted to vote NO on the bill.
When you are pillaging and plundering the public treasury, you have to make sure you can sell the bill as bi-partisan.
The Democrats lost the House in 1994 because Clinton got enough Democrats to make Nafta look bi-partisan. The anti-Nafta position was the natural political position for Democrats. They paid a price.
It would seem to me that siding Bush and former Goldman exec. Paulson to bail out Wall Street to the tune of 700 million is not the natural political position for Democrats.
Maybe they trust their sales ablity and the ability to spin.
The MSM is after all the bureau for Democrat Party propaganda.
I think Representatives on both sides of the aisle will lose their seat if they vote for the bailout.
Anyway that is what is going on now, reluctant Representatives in both parties are being called into the leadership offices, and told to drink the Kool-Aid, now, before the Asian markets open.