Not one response from you smegma laden 'birther' losers. You don't have a dollar to to your shameful names.
Come on, write me.
Come on, write me.
Quote from OPTIONAL777:
The evidence I have seen doesn't yield the same conclusion are you have drawn.
Strict Constitutionalists are in the same leagues as fundamentalist Christians, or Islamic fundamentalists.
Each group is self righteous, believing they have the right point of view.
All these groups have firebrand leaders and sheep like followers.
They believe their interpretation came directly from God's lips to their ears...
Yall are totalitarian thinkers, fearful of independent thinking, or a different read on the words in documents written in a very different time than we live in today.
I don't think the framers would have any respect for a bunch of people who were fundamentalists hanging on the words they didn't actually understand like a bunch of drones unable to decide for themselves what is the right thing to do.
Birthers are dogmatists, propagating their opinions as if they were facts...when, in fact they are just opinions.
Quote from good ole boy:
Not one response from you smegma laden 'birther' losers. You don't have a dollar to to your shameful names.
Come on, write me.
Quote from gastropod:
I am too moral to take money from the stupid! You too should wake the fuck up! -gastropod
Quote from OPTIONAL777:
I would be fine if the movement were not about a sitting president.
If rules are passed for elections in 2016 that require better documentation than was good enough for Hawaii, and everyone else until after he was elected...that seems fair.
There is a reason that when legislation is passed that grandfathering in is common.
I don't see a reasonable solution at this point, as I am convinced that there is nothing in the world that will change the birther's opinions.
If a BC was produced, they would demand experts reviewed it...if these experts declared it valid, they would then attack the experts, etc.
There is no satisfying conspiracy theorists...especially when they have an irrational hatred for a sitting president.
I was a big critic of Bush, but I never hated him. I didn't like what he was doing, I thought he is and was a boob...but there is a line between criticism and blind hatred of the type we see with Obama by the birthers.

Quote from RCG Trader:
Obama embodies a fundamental shift in this nation that some cannot accept as it would challenge their world view. As I said to another poster, view it as a Vulcan knocking on your door.
Quote from RCG Trader:
It is trauma, and in cases of severe mental trauma, there is little one can do to express logic. 777, go to Springfield, Ill. and go to the Lincoln Museum. See what the newspapers had to say about him, both north and south, during the civil war. It was very insightful for me.
Obama embodies a fundamental shift in this nation that some cannot accept as it would challenge their world view. As I said to another poster, view it as a Vulcan knocking on your door.
It is interesting to watch, interesting indeed.![]()
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Katherine_HarrisQuote from gastropod:
...Catherine Harris was a DEMOCRAT!!!!
More like self-preservation on your part than morality. In any event, for you to take money from the stupid would be to take money from your front pocket and put it into your back pocket. Round and round she goes.Quote from gastropod:
I am too moral to take money from the stupid!