AWESOME news for Obama, democrats, terrorists and other enemies of America
- Thread starter TGregg
- Start date
Paul and his followers are not the neocon Palin/Limbaugh/Birther/Nutball GOPers...
Paul and his followers had no clout in the GOP primary or the convention in 2008.
"Though projections of 2008 Republican delegate counts varied widely, Paul's count was consistently third among the three candidates remaining after Super Tuesday."
Paul was/is a non factor in the GOP...
Paul and his followers had no clout in the GOP primary or the convention in 2008.
"Though projections of 2008 Republican delegate counts varied widely, Paul's count was consistently third among the three candidates remaining after Super Tuesday."
Paul was/is a non factor in the GOP...
None that I can think of, so why would the right be fearful of the so called "grievances" they might air?
If we demonstrate through an open trial how irrational these people are, how we are not fearful of the irrational people saying what they will say, it only strengthens our position as the truly rational party...
Unless we have no rational response to their claims...
Let the crazy man rant and rave, the sane ones watching will figure it out on their own...
If we demonstrate through an open trial how irrational these people are, how we are not fearful of the irrational people saying what they will say, it only strengthens our position as the truly rational party...
Unless we have no rational response to their claims...
Let the crazy man rant and rave, the sane ones watching will figure it out on their own...
You mean sort of like the President of the United States telling the people not to worry because they will be found guilty. Shouldn't someone tell the "Constitutional Scholar" that guilt is decided by the Judicial Branch not the Executive.
Prosecutors all the time tell people that the defendant is guilty and that the people should not worry about the verdict...that the defendant will be found guilty.
It is called confidence in a case based on the evidence, and in this case, Obama is the prosecutor in chief...
It is called confidence in a case based on the evidence, and in this case, Obama is the prosecutor in chief...
Forgotten somewhere is all this noise is that alleged Al-Qaeda conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui was tried and convicted in U.S. District Court in Alexandria,VA. If the US can do that, why shouldnât KSM be tried in civilian court?
Rudy Giuliani, BTW, applauded Moussaouiâs trial saying that it showed we are a ânation of law.â http://mediamatters.org/research/200911130056
Rudy Giuliani, BTW, applauded Moussaouiâs trial saying that it showed we are a ânation of law.â http://mediamatters.org/research/200911130056
According to the Obama admin if a terrorist goes after a military target they are afforded less rights than a terrorist who targets civilians. That is the guideline that has been put forward. Bottomline, if you want to be a terrorist then target civilians and Obama will afford you more rights for doing so.
Quote from TGregg:
The moose limbs on trial are really Mossad agents.
I didn't think about that one. Looks like you are the expert on conspiracy theorists here.
