Avoiding pregnancy is a key component of women's health

in other words the drone boy phoenix can't back his statement up on yet another thread.

And jem is too lazy to do a simple search. AAA did, but jem can't be bothered, just as he can't be bothered to verify any of the rightwing dogma he so freely repeats.
 
already told you, you were likely mis - translating a greek word.
I have already disabused trolls on this subject on et before. I seriously doubted you could come up with a new one.

So far you have manifest nothing but your usual douche comments in support of your douche response.
 
here is where I told you were most likely using a poor translation of the world koy lee'ah.

interesting... can you provide the links to the passages.
I believe you are using bibles with dumbed down interpretations of the greek word... koy-lee'-ah.

however, lets not mistake that fact that partial birth abortion is simply legal infanticide and you don't have to believe in God to find that barbaric.
 
None of which has anything to do with the procedures for inducing miscarriage or with the definition of "living being".

But you are welcome to go on with this if you like. It's clear now why your environment threads are a thousand posts long.
 
below is your quote... now support it and stop being a douche.


db said:
"Speaking of which, I was interested in learning that the Bible doesn't consider a baby to be a living being until it has taken its first breath after the birth process. Not only that, it provides instructions for inducing miscarriage. So I guess the entire discussion was moot."





None of which has anything to do with the procedures for inducing miscarriage or with the definition of "living being".

But you are welcome to go on with this if you like. It's clear now why your environment threads are a thousand posts long.
 
below is your quote... now support it and stop being a douche.


db said:
"Speaking of which, I was interested in learning that the Bible doesn't consider a baby to be a living being until it has taken its first breath after the birth process. Not only that, it provides instructions for inducing miscarriage. So I guess the entire discussion was moot."

Yes. As I've quoted it three times now, that is what I said to begin with. And, again, you never bothered to look it up whereas AAA did.

Call me a douche if you like, but the fact remains that you do not or cannot independently determine the veracity of the information you hear or read. Therefore your comments about the Democrats -- which started all this -- cannot be supported.
 
Again, what I said was "I was interested in learning that the Bible doesn't consider a baby to be a living being until it has taken its first breath after the birth process. Not only that, it provides instructions for inducing miscarriage." What others take away from what they read is entirely theirs. But since AAA is the only one who's bothered, there isn't likely to be much discussion, if any.

You mean since AAA was the only one who got tired of waiting for you to backup your claims by providing the source info for what you were claiming?

He provided the source info and in there I don't see anything that supports your commentary. So unless you've got more to provide (sure, lol) then I don't anticipate there will be further discussion - unless you want to dodge and obfuscate a bit more before being firmly planted in the "bullshit" category yet again.
 
I was referring to Tsing and Maxipad when I spoke of those particular judgments, but you being a loyal and friend were there to take up arms in their defense.

I saw this when I was searching for one of my own posts (search criteria "Tsing")...just wanted to apologize for not responding to whatever it was you were saying to me or Max. The way you post, with giant spaces between each line makes for a pain in the ass to follow your train of thought. That, and you often jump around as you conceptualize what you want to relay to your target audience. Your posts lack continuity, and as such, I often just jump over them.
 
Back
Top