The last 5 pages or so may have all been in good fun, but don't flatter yourself with the delusion that you have somehow prompted me out of hiding, when it has clearly been the other way around.
So, know-you-are-but-what-am-I? haha...classic.
I've given you plenty of chances to engage, mono y mono, but your usual tactic is to sidestep, and back out.
Really? Hmm, I didn't see them. Perhaps they're on the part of the forum I don't have access to?
You have created a clever way of obfuscating the truth by waiting for me to go away, then claiming you won't read through my comment because it contains too many spaces between sentences, or that it's garbled and lacks continuity of thought.
What are you talking about, waiting for you to go away? How am I supposed to know your online schedule? Don't kid yourself, little guy. I don't wait for you to go away. But your stuff IS difficult to read - these gigantic posts where you type one line, enter, one line, enter, one line...etc. Ad naseum.
You, lie, as usual.
That's conclusive, well done. You lie as usual, too. >

It's doubtful I could have been much clearer.
On this, we agree. You probably couldn't have.
I've stood behind my statements, taking the time to articulate. Perhaps it's you who is too dense to comprehend sentences with gaps in between them.
Which statements are we talking about? Because to my recollection, these last 5 pages of "good fun" are all we've really talked about with each other. I don't recall other conversations...which are you referring to?
You say I am still having trouble with indentations? lol! Show me one post in here where anyone uses indentations to start a paragraph?
I was poking fun at the last few posts of yours - clearly evident of deleting lots of extra lines out of them (you've regressed, though)...
So, what is next, do we go on talking about your tendency to associate men in loincloths with gay internet porn sex while your computer defragments?
If that is your topic of interest - though you'll forgive me if I don't join in. My defrag finished quite some time ago.
Btw, fellas, Judy Garland is for a fact one of the top ten fantasy women for white males under the age of 90. I myself had a poster of her as a lad. So, in what queer world does having a Judy Garland dvd equate to homosexuality?
Can you show me the source for that statistic?
You guys are giving off so many rampant homoerotic undertones and homophobic overtones it's damn near getting tough to keep reading it.
But you somehow keep going. You trooper, you!
But being the solid entertainers you are, I won't abandon the conversation just yet.![]()
Nor will I. Sorry, though, if it took me more than 2 minutes to get back to you. Honest Injun, I just got back from a meeting - not waiting to see if you're leaving before I reply (whatever that is supposed to do

By the way, I hate posting like this - one line thoughts...can't you go for more continuity?
