On a BOX? Incredible. I assume you pulled your money out of that place right after you found out?
I did. It was during the crazy period when Enron was imploding. Regardless, unacceptable. I had $0 variation margin.
On a BOX? Incredible. I assume you pulled your money out of that place right after you found out?
To quote some movie "shit, fuck, Jesus".Regardless, unacceptable.
I must confess to having an IB account.
....I keep thinking of switching to some futures broker so I can run them leveraged, but I am too lazy.
Let me modify my statement to a "proper futures broker"Uhhh... IB is a futures broker

To quote some movie "shit, fuck, Jesus".
While I've never heard any good things about them, I must confess to having an IB account. It's the broker that has reporting relationships with most firms on the street so it's easy from the compliance perspective - I hold a few dollars worth of SPYs and TLTs there in some semblance of risk parity. Every year or so I keep thinking of switching to some futures broker so I can run them leveraged, but I am too lazy.
The position should either have been liquidated by selling the spread as a whole or by first selling the short options and thereafter the long options.
I'm guessing that since he legged in The Algorithm, may it's name be praised, was too stupid to see it as a spread. As to which position It liquidates first, that appears to be run via a random number generator.
Yep, that is exactly my problem. In my view the opposite should have happened.I'm surprised at this too...in fact I must be missing something fundamental: wouldn't closing the long side increase your required margin (i.e. decrease your excess liquidity)? Isn't that the opposite of what should be happening? I've only been auto-liquidated twice, and each time involved closing one of my short positions. Weren't your long positions hedging your short ones? If so, why would they auto-close one of your longs?