Average WEEKLY wage of $9440 for finance in NYC?

after reading a bloomberg article earlier today on stanford business school, i was redirected to a BLS.gov website on weekly wages, and was surprised to see that the average weekly wage is $9,440 for the "financial activities supersector" in Manhattan (as of first quarter 2018)

https://www.bls.gov/regions/new-yor...ease/countyemploymentandwages_newyorkcity.htm

upload_2019-2-2_19-26-56.png


That's pretty incredible, translates to $9440 x 52 = $490,880 annual wage on average.

But given that the common observation is that investment banks are bottom heavy, with only a few % who make MD/partner, the $490k average seems quite high

any insights on this? if that's literally the average, got to bring it up with my boss on the next salary discussion, lol
 
Yeah you need median

yeah, i mean that's my thought too, right skewed distributions/ outliers, but if BLS govt statisticians are reporting "average" there must be a reason they chose that right?

& i just did a rough numbers check,

nyc population - 9 million
nyc working population - 4 million
financial industry workers - approx. 200,000

if the average annual wage is $500k for nyc finance, then total annual wage payout would be 200,000 x $500k = $100 billion

which seems reasonable given that
goldman paid out $11 billion in salary/benefits in 2017 per their financials, on around 36000 headcount, for avg $305k, but then that is global workforce, so i imagine the nyc avg for them is prob higher, given that mix of headcount tilts toward front office more in nyc, as opposed to smaller cities

still, the $500k per year average seems rather high, given that:
- not everyone in nyc finance works at goldman
- even at gs most jobs probably don't pay $500k (or do they)

so what gives?

assuming of course, that there is no excel coding error by some intern who churned out the $9440 avg weekly number
 
Last edited:
Interesting bit is that you can impute the average bonus from these numbers. First, you assume that the regular weekly wage is 3k-ish, so the balance is due to the single bonus check. There are 13 weeks in a quarter, so ($9440 * 13 - $2750 * 13) = 86 grand would be an estimated median bonus for the investment bank. Sounds about right, from my experience.
 
Interesting bit is that you can impute the average bonus from these numbers. First, you assume that the regular weekly wage is 3k-ish, so the balance is due to the single bonus check. There are 13 weeks in a quarter, so ($9440 * 13 - $2750 * 13) = 86 grand would be an estimated median bonus for the investment bank. Sounds about right, from my experience.

good point, i had originally annualized the whole thing, now realize that it should only be multiplied for the 1st quarter since that's when bonuses are paid out
 
The
Interesting bit is that you can impute the average bonus from these numbers. First, you assume that the regular weekly wage is 3k-ish, so the balance is due to the single bonus check. There are 13 weeks in a quarter, so ($9440 * 13 - $2750 * 13) = 86 grand would be an estimated median bonus for the investment bank. Sounds about right, from my experience.

I doubt the average weekly wage is 3k-ish. I think that category includes bank tellers and back office people.

The average compensation at Goldman is like 400k. It’s about as pure of an ibank around.
 
Back
Top