Drew
Ntforest....If the distribution of happy/unhappy people is somewhat similar between wealthy and poor....then wouldn't you rather be unhappy and rich than unhappy and poor assuming the same level of unhappiness?
Of course... like I said, who could argue with that? I wasn't saying poverty was better than wealth, quite the contrary. No one should have to live in any kind of poverty. I was saying that the dogged pursuit of wealth for wealth's sake, purely for wealth's sake, ONLY to be rich, ONLY because rich is better than poor, ONLY because one has the illusion that wealth equals instant happiness, seemed one-dimensional at best.
I've seen people literally obsessed with wealth acquisition to the point where they can't conduct a normal existence. That was the convoluted point I was trying to make... see what I mean? If money is all you think and care about, if it consumes you to the point of being dysfunctional or socially inept, and if you believe, des pite al that, that this makes you somehow better than everyone else... my point was that that in itself is weird... and kind of gross.
It's interesting because some people who have made it big, or whatever, like the google folks, seem really quite uninterested in what you would think they would do with their big bucks. Doesn't one of htose google guys still live in a rented apartment? For him, my assumption is that his wealth is a side effect of being a brilliant entrepreneur, computer science guy, whatever he is.
Anyway, whatever. You see what I mean.