Average daily profit with $50K account?

Quote from JustDoingIt:

Yes...I have been sucked back into this black hole of the trading world known as Elite Trader. The damn webmaster and moderators ought to be sued for false advertising. There are a few traders here that actually trade and make their nut, but I can see that they are in the minority. A lot of wannabees and jock riders that don't know the bid from the ask inhabit this board and it seems that this particular convo has devolved into a damn mission impossible like all the others.
1st and foremost...the damn OP popped in with a question and hasn't been seen since. I think the moderators come up with most of this bullshit to keep debate and arguments going. It seems the topics with the controversy get all the views and comments. Since so many of you guys are into backtesting and algorithmic trading and all that BS I'm sure you also know how to reverse engineer a strategy.
So you have 50k and you want to make $500/day average...how are you going to do it? What instruments are you going to trade? What is your max daily loss? What strategies are you going to use? Many of you guys keep talking about risk as if it is commensurate with the reward which it is not. If you want to make $500/day your max loss should be $500 or less/day. Some days you may make up to $1500-$2000 but never lose more than $500. Take profits out of your account regularly to keep it from being exposed to the market and you will be well on your way.
No income trader I know speaks in percentage terms because percentages don't pay the bills. And only an ignorant ass would compare an income trader with a 50k account with that of a fund manager with hundreds of millions under management. Ever hear the term scalable strategy? I see why No Doji stopped her thread. She must be a damn savant since she is averaging $500/day with a 50k account. The funny thing is that a trader with a futures account that has 50k in it has a bad day when he makes $500. First thing we need to do is tighten up the definition of trader. Just because someone can afford to fund a damn Etrade account doesn't make them a trader. I have a couple pairs of Jordans and that doesn't make me pro ball player now does it? I constantly hear that 95% of traders fail...I'll contend that 95% of the people that have an account shouldn't be called traders.

Now we are getting somewhere...thank you.

NiN
 
Quote from Bolimomo:

Let me summarize what some of the posters were saying. At least that's the impression I got from their posts. I am not agreeing with them, but found their point of view interesting.

- Trading performance is not measured by percentage gains but should be measured by absolute dollar gain.

- Getting an average profit of $500 a day has nothing to do with account size. You can get this with a $50k account or even less as long as you have good leverage.

- Never compound your gain. Compounding makes me mad.

- I will trade 1 to 9 contracts to get $500 a day. Or roughly $125,000 a year. It doesn't matter if I have 10 million dollars in my bank or other people give me more money to trade. $500 a day is all I am aiming for and I am happy with it. Forever.

Basically.

For #1, consider if you and I both trade 2 ES contracts a day and we sit side by side and we always take the same entries and exits and we always make $500 per day, but your account has $1M in it and mine has $10k in it. After a year, we've both made the same amount of money on the same amount of contracts, yet my % gain is much bigger. But that's pointless, because our performance was identical. So if I were to go around bragging about how I'm so much better of a trader than you because I made so much more percentage that you, it wouldn't actually be true because we actually had the same trading performance.

Percentage matters if we're a fund investing other people's money, not if we're traders for ourself.
 
Quote from icarus618:


For intraday trading in markets, there is another path that is possible. The black curve
roughs out this path. For learning to trade, the path moves from upper left to lower right.

Why on earth would it move that way? As you learn, shouldn't you go from lower right (high risk, low profit) to upper left (low risk, high profit)???
 
Quote from 1a2b3cppp:


For #1, consider if you and I both trade 2 ES contracts a day and we sit side by side and we always take the same entries and exits and we always make $500 per day, but your account has $1M in it and mine has $10k in it. After a year, we've both made the same amount of money on the same amount of contracts, yet my % gain is much bigger. But that's pointless, because our performance was identical. So if I were to go around bragging about how I'm so much better of a trader than you because I made so much more percentage that you, it wouldn't actually be true because we actually had the same trading performance.

Percentage matters if we're a fund investing other people's money, not if we're traders for ourself.

No I disagree with this. I believe percentage does matter for traders. Because trading performance is a measure of a trader's efficiency in utilizing his resources (mainly capital), whether the money is managed money or one's own money.

If you have only access to $10k and you can make $100,000 profit out of it, you are much more efficient than me trading with $1million to make $100,000. You are 100 times more efficient than me.

If I have one million dollars, I can probably find some very-minimum risk bonds to make 4%-5% a year. This equates to $40k-$50k. That's income to me without lifting a finger. Would I be using this capital to trade everyday, risking the capital, to get a $100,000 profit?

And with $1million at my disposal, would you think I will be only trading 2 ES contracts at a time?

I believe that trading skills are not directly scalable. Meaning that the way I trade if I use $10k as trading capital is very different from the way I trade if I use $1million. Part of it is because of risk tolerance. Others are the market impact costs and speed of trading activities, etc.. It is a lot quicker to buy/sell 2 ES contracts than to buy/sell 100,000 shares of stocks. Steering a cargo ship is much more difficult than steering a jetski.
 
I think the discussion is a little off - and the lats remark was ok. Traders in general dont work for % - although percentage is definitely a sign of efficient capital allocation.

A trader is not paid for his money, but for his time and skill. The percentages may look crazy, but if I see waht I get paid for in my current gig I make about, taking costs for travel etc. as investment, 500% monthly. But like a trader I am not so much paid for my ability to finance the job, but for my skill and time.

Traders at one point either get uncomfortable with the size they have to move (so they take money out and stay at the same size) or hit a saturation limit (as in: you can not trade unlimited amounts of money - the market is just not liquid enough).

As for reasonable returns...

for USD 500 I would expect to see the use of a maximum of 3 contracts ES, and that is pretty conservative (assuming 3-4 trades per day, average 50 USD profit each). There are some simple strategies that can do that.

Three ES one can trade intraday SAFELY with around 15.000 - having PLENTY of reserves for drawdowns. Depending on broker you may need up to 6000 USD actually, some would allow that for less than 1000 (i have seeen 300 USD per contract as intraday margin). Now, DOING that is anothe rmatter - but if one has the skill and a prooven system that is about what I would expect in numbers.

Forex would be pretty similar in returns.
 
Quote from PiggyBank:

Nah I didn't forget anything, you are assuming that u are fully leveraged on each trade for a 2% dd to blow u out, but I didn't say or imply that. You scale your size according to what is in your acct, so if are drawing down, you size down and size up as u are making (water marks). There probably aren't that many traders who are all in every trade (max BP), unless they can reload easily. Maybe if u read my post before last u will get an idea. 10% on BP was an arbitrary number any way, just to make a simple point, which apparently u didn't get.

Piggy, there are two different tasks:
1) Earn 10% per year
2) Earn 10% per year with maximum 2% DD. Under the restriction of 2%DD!

Again it is REGARDLESS of your leverage. The ratio remains the same, 10%/2% = 5. Or 250 000 / 50 000 = 5, period. If you leverage less you experience less DD but you DO NOT reach your profit target, period.

Let me give you another example.
There is a single stock on the market which you can buy. If you buy it and hold till the end of year you receive 100%, but meanwhile you experience a DD of 33%.
Now you want to make 200%, is it possible? Yes, you buy that stock with the leverage of 2:1 and at the end of year you receive 200% but your DD will be 66%.
Now you want to make 300%, is it possible? NOT. Because of when you buy this stock with the leverage of 3:1 you aim to receive 300% but your DD is 100% and you loss the entire position.

Is it so complex? I just have no other words, only swearing.
Now I know somebody will tell me that trading is different. That you not buy and hold but rather buy different assets and divercify your position. You might say you would sell the position during the DD and buy it back when stock will be in the UP trend. But I know what would be my reply. Stupidity is endless.
 
Quote from NetTecture:

I think the discussion is a little off - and the lats remark was ok. Traders in general dont work for % - although percentage is definitely a sign of efficient capital allocation.


Discretionary traders live for the money from market. It is hard to calculate the % return because of they have multiple withdraws. They do not see the forest behind the trees.
But system traders test their system based on history. They understand the statistics, the historical DD and expected DD. The daily average PnL. The ratio of yearly return / DD.
System traders think of % return. The ES market is very liquid and you may trade hundreds of contracts before you reach your limit.


Quote from NetTecture:

As for reasonable returns...

for USD 500 I would expect to see the use of a maximum of 3 contracts ES, and that is pretty conservative (assuming 3-4 trades per day, average 50 USD profit each). There are some simple strategies that can do that.

Three ES one can trade intraday SAFELY with around 15.000 - having PLENTY of reserves for drawdowns. Depending on broker you may need up to 6000 USD actually, some would allow that for less than 1000 (i have seeen 300 USD per contract as intraday margin). Now, DOING that is anothe rmatter - but if one has the skill and a prooven system that is about what I would expect in numbers.

Forex would be pretty similar in returns.


Again you post your expected returns but without exact value of DD. You post that "15 000 is safe level". I read history of your posts. You just opened an account and want to go live. I believe that when you start trading live you will forget about this statement "3-4 trades per day, average $50 profit per each". This is a complete BS.
 
Quote from NetTecture:

Your believes, sadly, are irrelevant stupid ramblings. Sorry to say ;)

Ok could you please post a screenshot of your daily PnL and amount of ES traded? Or may be you will be so kind to share these "very simple strategies" which allow you to make $150 per day per ES contract? I am away, there is a long queue buying popcorn and waiting for show.
 
Apparently Larry Levin is making 100%+ a month.
This is a portion of an email I received from his sales dept. "We trade with a $5,000 account every month and have been averaging approximately $6,000 to $8,000 in returns in our Virtual Trading Room*."

So there you go guys.
 
Back
Top