I think that is a bad question. Look at risk adjusted return. It didn't matter if you made 30% a year for the past decade, b/c those growth guys can't play defense. They got hosed and now after 2 straight 50% down years, you have as much as you did in 1990, and you had to pay taxes probably. I know that there are a lot of people on these boards who've had 50%+ years every year. I think that's a satisfactory level of return, and I know it's done with low risk. I wouldn't accept anything under 30-50%, and if I were accepting something that low, I'd want to know how it was done, and about drawdowns. If I were not investing my own money, I'd look to a few of those people on these boards who've had a history of kicking ass in their own hedge funds.