I wonder if (very recent) history is repeating itself:
http://fortune.com/2018/10/30/jack-burkman-false-claims-robert-mueller/
I guess we'll find out soon enough.
Avenatti The Slayer
- Thread starter exGOPer
- Start date
http://fortune.com/2018/10/30/jack-burkman-false-claims-robert-mueller/
I guess we'll find out soon enough.
If it was as superficial and baseless as Avenatti and his fanboyz would have you believe - why again did the Sheriffs arrest him, book him, jail him, the DA bring FELONY charges and the judge set bail at $50,000 ? They could have brought a misdemeanor DV charge but apparently she got beat up pretty good and Apartment Security was also involved.
Last edited:
https://www.greghillassociates.com/how-is-bail-set-what-factors-are-considered-in-its-amount.html
The amount of bail required depends on the severity of the crime, as well as enhancements such as using a firearm during the alleged crime, having a prison prior within the last ten years and prior sex offenses when the crime at issue is another sex offense. Bail also varies by county. Each county in California has its own bail schedule for each type of offense. For example, in 2012, felony domestic violence had a bail amount of $50,000 in Los Angeles and Orange County, but in Kern County, bail for the same offense was $25,000. Every few years, a group of judges reviews the bail amounts for each crime and changes the amounts as they see fit.
Bail is initially set by the police, but a judge can review the amount set when requested by a defendant. Bail, for example, cannot be so high that it has the practical effect of barring the release of a defendant, although this often is exactly what happens to many poor defendants. Likewise, theoretically, bail should be increased from the bail schedule amounts when the defendant is quite wealthy and paying the bail amount does not guarantee his or her return to court.
you only need to go back a few pages about right wing sites running fake stories about the guy being trolled into taking up clients. Also about how the vice squad that arrested stormy on bogus charges is currently under investigation. Cons don't do history
Last edited:
If someone managed to get both the girlfriend and Apartment security to play along I suppose anything’s possible. Not likely though - you’ve security guards and cameras to contend with and the girlfriend breakup was quite recent.
As far as i know those details have only been reported by one outlet on no physical evidence when they're well known to leak videos all the time.
It is definitely going to make the rounds on talk radio, Fox and MSNBC. Could be great entertainment for a night or two. My hero is Stormy. I'd like to bring out a wine label with a nude of the younger Stormy on the label. I wonder if there are any vineyard owners out there that will back me. I think Red is more appropriate than white here. We can give a nickel for every bottle sold to the Stormy Daniels defense fund. "Stormy Vineyards, Cabernet Sauvignon, 100% Organic."
https://hillreporter.com/exclusive-jacob-wohl-speaks-out-about-michael-avenattis-arrest-14645
Wohl chickening out
Wohl backtracked on his previous tweet in which he claimed “Surefire Intelligence strikes again,” in regards to news that Avenatti had been arrested.
“Just to be in jest, not anything serious,” Wohl told us after we asked him why he tweeted such a comment. “Just in jest, yeah… sarcastic remark… joke,” he continued.
“It’s a felony domestic violence case, which means there were injuries,” Wohl explained, seemingly knowing quite a lot about Avenatti’s arrest. “That’s how it works in California. Otherwise it’s a misdemeanor — it gets put down to a ‘415: Disturbing the Peace’. I understand there were inaccuracies with the TMZ story, but nonetheless, this is a very serious charge that Mr. Avenatti stands accused of, and it’s completely physically impossible, and inconceivable, that I had anything to do with him being charged. How could I be behind him allegedly striking a woman?”
We explained to Wohl that many people are suggesting that he may have set Avenatti up in some way. Wohl then said something that was rather interesting:
“Yeah but it was his live-in girlfriend. So I’ve been running his live-in girlfriend as some kind of manchurian candidate for 6/7 months?”
This is quite an odd statement, given that we are unaware of any reports claiming that the woman accuser had been living with Avenatti for at least ‘6-7 months’. After informing Wohl that we are completely unaware of the accuser having been a live-in girlfriend who had been living with Avenatti for over half a year, he seemed to backtrack a bit.
“It could be someone else, you are right. That’s interesting to point out, but anyway, OK, well that’s that on that story.”
Yesterday TMZ published a video in which Michael Avenatti again threatened Wohl, apparently with legal action in regards to his arrest for domestic violence. He has yet to provide any details for his assumptions that Wohl was involved though. Wohl, however, seems to be basking in the glory of the attention it’s attracting to him.
Wohl chickening out
Wohl backtracked on his previous tweet in which he claimed “Surefire Intelligence strikes again,” in regards to news that Avenatti had been arrested.
“Just to be in jest, not anything serious,” Wohl told us after we asked him why he tweeted such a comment. “Just in jest, yeah… sarcastic remark… joke,” he continued.
“It’s a felony domestic violence case, which means there were injuries,” Wohl explained, seemingly knowing quite a lot about Avenatti’s arrest. “That’s how it works in California. Otherwise it’s a misdemeanor — it gets put down to a ‘415: Disturbing the Peace’. I understand there were inaccuracies with the TMZ story, but nonetheless, this is a very serious charge that Mr. Avenatti stands accused of, and it’s completely physically impossible, and inconceivable, that I had anything to do with him being charged. How could I be behind him allegedly striking a woman?”
We explained to Wohl that many people are suggesting that he may have set Avenatti up in some way. Wohl then said something that was rather interesting:
“Yeah but it was his live-in girlfriend. So I’ve been running his live-in girlfriend as some kind of manchurian candidate for 6/7 months?”
This is quite an odd statement, given that we are unaware of any reports claiming that the woman accuser had been living with Avenatti for at least ‘6-7 months’. After informing Wohl that we are completely unaware of the accuser having been a live-in girlfriend who had been living with Avenatti for over half a year, he seemed to backtrack a bit.
“It could be someone else, you are right. That’s interesting to point out, but anyway, OK, well that’s that on that story.”
Yesterday TMZ published a video in which Michael Avenatti again threatened Wohl, apparently with legal action in regards to his arrest for domestic violence. He has yet to provide any details for his assumptions that Wohl was involved though. Wohl, however, seems to be basking in the glory of the attention it’s attracting to him.
IMO the Dems were just as eager to get rid of him as Trump.
Note how besides his internet Fanboyz - NO Democratic Party representatives are stepping out of their way to defend him. Crickets from the Dems...
Note how besides his internet Fanboyz - NO Democratic Party representatives are stepping out of their way to defend him. Crickets from the Dems...
No doubt about it. There was a ton of chatter from mainstream media about how he "killed" the Kavanaugh investigations/allegations, as if the GOP would've looked into Kavanaugh further with the Ford's allegations alone. The dems are on some left slant and are abandoning ship on moderates....they'll likely nominate someone like Beto, but I'd rather have a winning asshole that likes money and has some legal background to undo the damage so far (be it Booker, Harris, or gasp Avenatti).
Looks like this thread didn't quite go the way you thought it was going to go, did it?