Brilliant post. Couldn’t agree more. People are generally just clueless, and either too dumb or lazy to measure anything.Most traders are clueless on how to measure/calculate expectancy and they are gamblers . Skilled quants are the best traders in the world , the most successful fund on the planet in last 30 years is 100% mathematical . A lot of whats in this thread is dribble . Saying it cant be done is expressing your limitations not mine
Definitely 100% gambling, with caveat being that money flows from players who lack control, to those who have control.The thread is not closed since no one proved yet AUTOMATED trading isn`t gambling.Please, consult the topic of the stinky thread.
Most do, but it’s not 100%. A few algo/quant operations are really raking it in.Brilliant 100% automated quants have negative months, even years, geniuses.
Definitely 100% gambling, with caveat being that money flows from players who lack control, to those who have control.

Most on this thread don't make the difference between gambling and trading. The two basic distinctions:So i found that the variables and variances should be gambling.Interesting to hear from those who found the same.