Everyone could use cTrader (cT). I think it's an allowable platform to compare HFT trading bots. The bots you write for cTrader are the cBots. You can try community cBots and share/sell yours. I'm waiting a bit to hear your opinions. When we share the vision, we can start the topic of this thread with CTrader.
A few members told me they can't access some of the bots I'm using. I expected as much. That's why I asked you to specify the platforms and bots. I mentioned MT and cT both being widely available platforms. However, I believe cT is better for HFT. So, if these platforms are what you use, I recommend cT to complete this thread's mission.
Again, some people might not read my introduction when I joined the forum. I'm here on behalf of my person, and everything I do for entertainment. I refer to the "if you..." and "...get more customers" comments. I'm not here to get customers. We've got marketing staff for that. Thanks.
I also don't see why the usage of standard indicators, like RSI, is a problem for some. In my experience, it's possible to make a profit with well-established methods. When I talk about experimental technologies, I do it for fun. You shouldn't interpret it as a requirement for profit.
Finally, about how profitable HFT can be to you as an individual: It's true that these strategies are often competitive in nature, and competing with other institutions can feel challenging on particular exchanges and pairs, but there are slots where you can fit with your bots. Finding a pair where you can stay competitive is part of the solution. One I can assist you with if it's an obstacle to you.
We all can diverge back to the original purpose of the discussion.
You name the bots and describe the results.
I'll see what I can do to compare them.
In my experience, you'll become a better trader if you don't focus on what you can't do but on what you can do. I'm positive that HFT can be available to people.
