If one can code the experience of reading chart context, He also solves the problem of discipline. All in all, it goes back to the question if the chart context can be coded.
I did not mention his personal life since it is irrelevant to the topic



The shorter your trading timeframe the more conflict you will get with competing programs...
ES
I believe this too. Yet, at the same time, wouldn't there be automated trading systems out there that trade longer time frames like daily, weekly or monthly ?
I say this because once in awhile I would see an analyst on TV or a quant say in a financial magazine article that their firm's models have now sold something they've had had for many days, weeks or months as part of their portfolio.
That would tell me that automation trading is not exclusive to small time frames and that there's firms or retail traders doing both via automation trading besides always hearing about the popularity of HFT...fear presented by the media that HFT is controlling the markets.
Simply, I think competing automation programs out there are by firms doing short-term and long-term trading.
wrbtrader
I believe this too. Yet, at the same time, wouldn't there be automated trading systems out there that trade longer time frames like daily, weekly or monthly ?
Automation doesn't have any edge over human traders on those timeframes. HFT brutalized scalpers because they held an edge in speed: the computers can react far more quickly to a much wider range of data. If you're trying to trade breakouts on a monthly chart, and do so systematically with 100% objective rules, it's irrelevant whether a human or a computer program physically enters the orders.
mr 2009, you want to get with Friend to work up a written rough draft "Protocol of the process that Friend uses to Read Chart Context? Rough draft. pencil, paper. go. Twenty - thirty minutes is a good start. Relax, have a homebrew. Still like the idea? Organize / rewrite your notes. Wait a day and decide.