Quote from Mike805:
This concept/trading idea is a risk management clusterf**k waiting to happen.
1. You have no idea as to what this strategy's risk truly is, both in terms market dynamic and worst case scenario.
2. The combining of "systems" further obscures your true risk since you do not know the statistical historical correlation of N-systems.
3. No effort can be made to quantify or reduce any type of abnormal market risk because the "combining" of these systems is essentially one big selection process that uses an unknown market dynamic to guide the selection process. You're fitting a curve fit...
4. Out of sample tests are not indicative of anything in this case because your NN will only have forecasting capability based on your training set. Since your rules are essentially "blind" rules with no "proof of concept" they may as well be random rules.
What you've essentially done is put 100 monkeys with an affinity for keyboards in front of trading desks and asked them to hit buy/sell buttons a few hundred times. You've then taken the "profitable" monkeys and placed your bets on them...
Christ... just go study a real edge instead of wasting your time with monkeys.
Mike:
Thanks for your input. I know I am fitting a curve. Read back to the first post of this thread. That was the point of this exercise. The exercise is to do something that most (yourself included) thinks is a bad idea. Then see the outcome.
I like your analogy using monkeys however its way off base. Perhaps the vagueness of the selection process and training of the neural networks as presented in the thread leads you to that conclusion. However, its far from the truth.
