Author of MIT climate study says Trump got it wrong

java said:
Is Seth Rich your climate science red herring now?
More...

Pointing out that the 'well read' right wingers you were harping about are the same fools who kept pushing conspiracy theories, how is that a red herring? Your 'well read' right wingers are susceptible to anchoring, they just read what confirms their groupthink.
 
How bout ask all scientists,
1.Is man made Co2 causing global warming.
2. Was Obama born in America?

and just throw out anybody's response who answers no to both questions?
 
java said:
How bout ask all scientists,
1.Is man made Co2 causing global warming.
2. Was Obama born in America?

and just throw out anybody's response who answers no to both questions?
More...

1. CO2 is not the only greenhouse gas
2. Why is that a scientist's job?
 
exGOPer said:
1. CO2 is not the only greenhouse gas
2. Why is that a scientist's job?
More...
I'll stop quoting them if you do. You can't hold your own on any scientific question or topic around here. I always enjoy it when somebody shows up with the New York Times and tries to start a climate change argument. They should have an over/under on how long they can go before they resort to name calling.
 
exGOPer said:
I have looked at that link, most of the papers are not even related to AGW and they are just asking questions and some of them are so old and proven incorrect with time (like the one on top from the 1970s)

Secondly, it's NASA's official website, how come Trump is allowing a student body to run it? Which NASA employees have been demanding this take down? Citation needed

And by the way EPA has a similar page here

https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators

Which student body is running them? Why hasn't Pruitt removed those pages if the info is fake?
More...

"Secondly, it's NASA's official website, how come Trump is allowing a student body to run it? Which NASA employees have been demanding this take down? Citation needed." - The proposed leaders being put in place at NASA have been given the mission of removing all "climate change" information and stopping all climate change activity because it is not the central mission of NASA.

Trump Budget Plan Targets Climate Science, Clean Energy Innovation for Deep Cuts
Research and development in clean cars and renewable energy would be slashed more than 70 percent, NASA climate programs would be cut, and EPA would lose 31 percent.
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/...-climate-change-science-funding-epa-usda-nasa

-------------------------------------------------

Please see all of my previous posts on the subject so I don't have to post all the information again. Here is a screen show from the climate.nasa.com website showing it is sourced from the California Institute of Technology

iTUME2m.jpg
 
Last edited:
Right - they are collaborating with academia which is what government does in most areas including defense.

My question is not about the program cuts, my question is why are they acknowledging these 'theories' on NASA and EPA websites if they are false? Why not simply remove them? It has been months to clean house, why the delay.
 
exGOPer said:
Right - they are collaborating with academia which is what government does in most areas including defense.

My question is not about the program cuts, my question is why are they acknowledging these 'theories' on NASA and EPA websites if they are false? Why not simply remove them? It has been months to clean house, why the delay.
More...

The new NASA administrators are no in place yet. The temporary office holders are not taking any action in the interim - just like all government agencies.
 
gwb-trading said:
The new NASA administrators are no in place yet. The temporary office holders are not taking any action in the interim - just like all government agencies.
More...

Right, what about the EPA though? Pruitt has been in charge for some time now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top