Aubrey O’Day, Donald Trump Jr.’s Alleged Ex, Is Spilling Tea & “Has Receipts”

Yikes. That may float some of you guy's boats, but that is not a very flattering picture. I'd hate to roll over in the morning and see what she looks like w/o makeup and those fake lashes.

What is it w/Jr and these gf's that look like they could be linemen in NCAA Division II?

I think Trump fired her from The Apprentice btw, so she may have an ax to grind.



220px-Aubrey_O%27Day.jpg

Yuk.
She's 36?
Dolly looks better than that; sings better too (Of course that goes without saying).
:vomit:

Yeah, President Donald Trump who is a billionaire and good looking guy especially, in his younger years is desperate to hook up with any skank? He also, used to own the Miss Universe beauty pageant if I remember correctly. The only one I would consider credible is Karen McDougal who was a Playboy playmate too. She held Donald Trump in high esteem and admits she had a crush on him and apologized to Melania Trump. Not like Donald Trump has a shortage of beautiful women around him?
 
Going back to WW2 we weren't even going to get involved until we were attacked, and if we didn't get involved 3/4 of Europe would've been speaking German. The axis powers were basically a few weeks off of a coup-de-grace that would've finished the west in Europe. Not only did we beat the Nazis, we also sent Japan back into the fucking stone age. Not because we needed to, but because we wanted to see how our new fangled meme tier nukes would work...twice.

The US hasn't been at war since WW2. Congress has not declared a war in any modern police action since. Every "loss" you'll respond to this with has been a politically motivated police action. Though you could argue we also roflstomped the north koreans in the 50s and the total victory against Saddam in the 90s were both successful police actions with the Saddam victory being like sending Michael Jordan in to beat a kiddie league after school basketball team.

I understand you're sad because the only thing Columbia exports is gang violence and poverty. But saying the US can't win a fight is probably the most stupid thing ever written by anyone who claims to know anything about war. And for someone who steals valor and personalities, I figured you'd at least have done some reading.

Your ideas on history are terrible. The US didn't win WW2 the Allies did. The UK and Russia had more to do with the Nazi's losing then the US did. The tide was already turning by the time the US bothered to join in. The US clearly lost in Vietnam. Bombing Japan was an immoral travesty never should have happened. Nuclear bombs should never be used. Every time you open your mouth you reveal a flawed education. Maybe that's what they teach in some American schools but it's not the reality of WW2.
 
Your ideas on history are terrible. The US didn't win WW2 the Allies did. The UK and Russia had more to do with the Nazi's losing then the US did. The tide was already turning by the time the US bothered to join in. The US clearly lost in Vietnam. Bombing Japan was an immoral travesty never should have happened. Nuclear bombs should never be used. Every time you open your mouth you reveal a flawed education. Maybe that's what they teach in some American schools but it's not the reality of WW2.

> I read this on reddit once

literally you.
 
Your ideas on history are terrible. The US didn't win WW2 the Allies did. The UK and Russia had more to do with the Nazi's losing then the US did. The tide was already turning by the time the US bothered to join in. The US clearly lost in Vietnam. Bombing Japan was an immoral travesty never should have happened. Nuclear bombs should never be used. Every time you open your mouth you reveal a flawed education. Maybe that's what they teach in some American schools but it's not the reality of WW2.

I accept that NineEnder is smart, educated, and a man of character. I cannot accept that NineEnder actually wrote the above post. Therefore, you are a house invader who may be holding NineEnder hostage. Release him immediately and leave his house now or IP addresses will be traced and authorities called!

Seriously, I’ve studied World War II in depth on my own, including reading many books on the subject. The US was actively involved helping the Allies before they Entered the war. You have heard of Lend-Lease, right? From wikipedia.org:

The Lend-Lease policy, formally titled An Act to Promote the Defense of the United States (Pub.L.77–11, H.R. 1776, 55 Stat.31, enacted March 11, 1941),[1] was a program under which the United States supplied the United Kingdom (and British Commonwealth), Free France, the Republic of China, and later the Soviet Union and other Allied nations with food, oil, and materiel between 1941 and August 1945. This included warships and warplanes, along with other weaponry. It was signed into law on March 11, 1941, and ended in September 1945. In general the aid was free, although some hardware (such as ships) were returned after the war. In return, the U.S. was given leases on army and naval bases in Allied territory during the war. Canada operated a similar smaller program called Mutual Aid.

A total of $50.1 billion (equivalent to $575 billion in 2019) worth of supplies was shipped, or 17% of the total war expenditures of the U.S.[2] In all, $31.4 billion went to the United Kingdom, $11.3 billion to the Soviet Union, $3.2 billion to France, $1.6 billion to China, and the remaining $2.6 billion to the other Allies


Further, it was the US commitment of manpower, technology, and equipment while focusing on Germany first that kept Russia in the war. It was alleged Stalin was near capitulation at their nadir when he talked about specific concessions to offer Germany in exchange for peace.

US dropping the atomic bomb was horrific and not militarily necessary. Just before the bombs were dropped, Japan’s refinery capacity was down 90%, their transportation infrastructure seriously damaged, the US achieved air supremacy over the skys of Japan, and mass starvation was looming. The US excuse for using the atomic bomb was fear over mass casualties an invasion might entail. Although “Quality targets” were getting harder to find, it seems to me the US could have waited the Japanesse out while further pounding their remaining energy production, transportation infrastructure, and industry. A Russian declaration of war against Japan would have likely convinced them further resistance was more than futile, even without the use of the atomic bombs. However, who knows how history would have unfolded if we did not show the world the horror of “Small” nuclear weapons on population centers. As it was, Russia and the United States came very close to nuclear war on several occasions, possibly making the knowledge of what awaited both sides in a nuclear war as being the difference in avoiding it.

I already went into more detail than orignally intended on the US contribution that most certainly changed the outcome of WWII in favor of the Allies. Just for a thought experiment, can you imagine what the current geopolitical landscape would look like if the US joined the Axis powers instead? Bye bye Russia, England, Canada, South America, etc., if the US wanted to rekindle “Manifest Destiny” again during WWII?
 
I accept that NineEnder is smart, educated, and a man of character. I cannot accept that NineEnder actually wrote the above post. Therefore, you are a house invader who may be holding NineEnder hostage. Release him immediately and leave his house now or IP addresses will be traced and authorities called!

Seriously, I’ve studied World War II in depth on my own, including reading many books on the subject. The US was actively involved helping the Allies before they Entered the war. You have heard of Lend-Lease, right? From wikipedia.org:

The Lend-Lease policy, formally titled An Act to Promote the Defense of the United States (Pub.L.77–11, H.R. 1776, 55 Stat.31, enacted March 11, 1941),[1] was a program under which the United States supplied the United Kingdom (and British Commonwealth), Free France, the Republic of China, and later the Soviet Union and other Allied nations with food, oil, and materiel between 1941 and August 1945. This included warships and warplanes, along with other weaponry. It was signed into law on March 11, 1941, and ended in September 1945. In general the aid was free, although some hardware (such as ships) were returned after the war. In return, the U.S. was given leases on army and naval bases in Allied territory during the war. Canada operated a similar smaller program called Mutual Aid.

A total of $50.1 billion (equivalent to $575 billion in 2019) worth of supplies was shipped, or 17% of the total war expenditures of the U.S.[2] In all, $31.4 billion went to the United Kingdom, $11.3 billion to the Soviet Union, $3.2 billion to France, $1.6 billion to China, and the remaining $2.6 billion to the other Allies


Further, it was the US commitment of manpower, technology, and equipment while focusing on Germany first that kept Russia in the war. It was alleged Stalin was near capitulation at their nadir when he talked about specific concessions to offer Germany in exchange for peace.

US dropping the atomic bomb was horrific and not militarily necessary. Just before the bombs were dropped, Japan’s refinery capacity was down 90%, their transportation infrastructure seriously damaged, the US achieved air supremacy over the skys of Japan, and mass starvation was looming. The US excuse for using the atomic bomb was fear over mass casualties an invasion might entail. Although “Quality targets” were getting harder to find, it seems to me the US could have waited the Japanesse out while further pounding their remaining energy production, transportation infrastructure, and industry. A Russian declaration of war against Japan would have likely convinced them further resistance was more than futile, even without the use of the atomic bombs. However, who knows how history would have unfolded if we did not show the world the horror of “Small” nuclear weapons on population centers. As it was, Russia and the United States came very close to nuclear war on several occasions, possibly making the knowledge of what awaited both sides in a nuclear war as being the difference in avoiding it.

I already went into more detail than orignally intended on the US contribution that most certainly changed the outcome of WWII in favor of the Allies. Just for a thought experiment, can you imagine what the current geopolitical landscape would look like if the US joined the Axis powers instead? Bye bye Russia, England, Canada, South America, etc., if the US wanted to rekindle “Manifest Destiny” again during WWII?

Your understanding of the war is weak and suggests you've read a lot of American propaganda.
 
Going back to WW2 we weren't even going to get involved until we were attacked, and if we didn't get involved 3/4 of Europe would've been speaking German. The axis powers were basically a few weeks off of a coup-de-grace that would've finished the west in Europe. Not only did we beat the Nazis, we also sent Japan back into the fucking stone age. Not because we needed to, but because we wanted to see how our new fangled meme tier nukes would work...twice.

The US hasn't been at war since WW2. Congress has not declared a war in any modern police action since. Every "loss" you'll respond to this with has been a politically motivated police action. Though you could argue we also roflstomped the north koreans in the 50s and the total victory against Saddam in the 90s were both successful police actions with the Saddam victory being like sending Michael Jordan in to beat a kiddie league after school basketball team.

I understand you're sad because the only thing Columbia exports is gang violence and poverty. But saying the US can't win a fight is probably the most stupid thing ever written by anyone who claims to know anything about war. And for someone who steals valor and personalities, I figured you'd at least have done some reading.


Worst "American hell yeah" cope I've read in a while. The Russians defeated the Germans, deal with it.
 
Your understanding of the war is weak and suggests you've read a lot of American propaganda.

Your response is weak. Support your statements, please.

By the way, one of the sources I base my opinion on is a author, Richard Rhodes, who interviewed several prominent Russian scientists who were quite engaged during WWII.

Another source I’ve used for information is German Nazi author Albert Speers.

Care to cite your sources that you base your reasoning and opinions on?
 
Your response is weak. Support your statements, please.

By the way, one of the sources I base my opinion on is a author, Richard Rhodes, who interviewed several prominent Russian scientists who were quite engaged during WWII.

Another source I’ve used for information is German Nazi author Albert Speers.

Care to cite your sources that you base your reasoning and opinions on?

I'm not going to expend a bunch of energy furthering your understanding of WW2. My point was to the other poster that the US did not defeat Germany in WW2. This is the reality of that war no amount of posted bs will change that. There are reasons why Germany was carved up into West Germany and East Germany, why Russia became a super military power, why the UK and France that used to be world super powers no longer are.

If there is one lesson some Americans need to learn, it's that the world is a massive place and even the most dominant military on the planet would be decimated in a World War. Occupying even a tiny country like Iraq is difficult and costly. If a countries people doesn't want you to liberate it, the cost and effort to do so is massive and eventually pointless.
 
Back
Top