Attn: Atheist...read the last line of the first post...

Quote from Barth Vader:

The day that an "ape-man" approaches me on a street corner asking for a few bucks to tide him over until his evolutionary process is complete, will be the day that you have indeed acheived a "fact" !

Or, on the otherhand KTS, the day that the church of Darwin does not need millions, billions and trillions of years to hide the "fact" that macro-evolution is not an observable event, and therefore will never be more than a "theory" or saga, will be the day you have acheived a "fact"........

I have my plastic sheet draped over me so you may begin throwing........:)

you, sir, are one of those that have no appreciation for reason, scientific method, you do not understand the nature of evidence nor it's importance, you sir are one of those FOOLS :D
 
Quote from Barth Vader:

The day that an "ape-man" approaches me on a street corner asking for a few bucks to tide him over until his evolutionary process is complete, will be the day that you have indeed acheived a "fact" !

Or, on the otherhand KTS, the day that the church of Darwin does not need millions, billions and trillions of years to hide the "fact" that macro-evolution is not an observable event, and therefore will never be more than a "theory" or saga, will be the day you have acheived a "fact"........

I have my plastic sheet draped over me so you may begin throwing........:)

Fascinating. I'm struggling to imagine myself watching a movie of, say, 100,000 frames, and seeing only those frames, and leaving the theater perhaps overwhelmed by trying to remember 100,000 frames, and not having seen the story!
 
Quote from killthesunshine:

you, sir, are one of those that have no appreciation for reason, scientific method, you do not understand the nature of evidence nor it's importance, you sir are one of those FOOLS :D

You have a good heart KTS............not many folks would apply the term "sir" and "fool" to the same person !
 
Quote from Ricter:

Fascinating. I'm struggling to imagine myself watching a movie of, say, 100,000 frames, and seeing only those frames, and leaving the theater perhaps overwhelmed by trying to remember 100,000 frames, and not having seen the story!

Please clarify your remarks.......I would like to make sure I understand your point before I reply.
 
Quote from Barth Vader:

You have a good heart KTS............not many folks would apply the term "sir" and "fool" to the same person !

So, since scientists haven't yet created smthg that scurried out their beaker when they popped the top you are quite sure it's all due to the benevolent bearded man that lives in the sky. haha :D
 
Quote from killthesunshine:

So, since scientists haven't yet created smthg that scurried out their beaker you are quite sure it's all due to the benevolent bearded man that lives in the sky. haha :D

I am quite sure that at the end of the day, we both take our beliefs on "faith".
 
Quote from Barth Vader:

I am quite sure that at the end of the day, we both take our beliefs on "faith".

Oh, so say you?

So, you see blind faith as efficacious as scientific methodology when it comes to verifiable fact? :D
 
Quote from killthesunshine:

Oh, so say you?

So, you see blind faith as efficacious as scientific methodology when it comes to verifiable fact? :D

Well, you attached the term "blind" to "faith".

As I believe in the creation account in Genesis, I also believe that all of what we call "science" is man's viewing of the creation footprint.
I am a firm advocate of "scientific methodology", the problem occurs when the "dogma" of man imprints and holds hostage "scientific methodology" to further the cause of a philosophical replacement for G-D. Science ceases to be so at this point.

Macro-evolution is a theory, nothing more and nothing less, as it cannot be observed or reproduced under the rigor of true "scientific methodology".........therefore it is taken on "faith".
 
Quote from Barth Vader:


As I believe in the creation account in Genesis,

Macro-evolution is a theory, nothing more and nothing less, as it cannot be observed or reproduced under the rigor of true "scientific methodology".........therefore it is taken on "faith".

Can the "creation account in Genesis" be observed or reproduced? Since DIRECT OBSERVATION by YOU seems to be THE pre-requisite to acceptance of theory? :D
 
Back
Top