Attn: Atheist...read the last line of the first post...

Ricter · Nov 17, 2009

What I find interesting is that the farther science is getting in understanding Man's origin and nature, the farther it is getting in debunking the idea of Man's free will.

killthesunshine · Nov 17, 2009

Quote from smilingsynic:

The facts are clear that humans share a common ancestor with apes and monkeys. Indeed, humans ARE apes.

Humans arrived on the scene hundreds of million years AFTER amphibians crawled out of the water onto land. This is supported by the fossil evidence.

It does not matter that Ms. Palin does not "feel" that way.

And as for God, God's existence is not a part of science. Science deals only with that which can be proven or tested. God does not fit into either of those.

+1

Lucrum · Nov 17, 2009

Quote from smilingsynic:

The facts are clear that humans share a common ancestor with apes and monkeys. Indeed, humans ARE apes.

Damn, you may be right!

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7451958401048013824#

If we ARE apes then why do dark skinned humans always go...well...uh...ape shit over anything that portrays them as apes?

jem · Nov 19, 2009

Quote from smilingsynic:

Facts don't feel. Facts are cold, heartless, and ruthless as they refute her creationist feelings.

Sorry I misread your response -- I thought you said there were facts which refuted her Creationist views.

I did not see her arguing that humans did or did not evolve from apes. Perhaps you were reading another thread.

It seemed to me you were saying she was wrong and you had cold hard facts which refute her beliefs.

By the way I am not a Palin fan. I just get annoyed when "posters of science" make up shit about what science says.

fhl · Nov 19, 2009

"Then you know that science proves evolution,"

-------------------------------------------------

Oh yeah, just like algore has proved man made global warming is a fact.

And just like obama has proved himself to be a natural born citizen of the US.

It just goes to show you that people who believe it's natural for a man to stick his wang up another mans ass will believe just about anything.

Dr. Zhivodka · Nov 19, 2009

Er..um....did I miss the dick up the ass thread that FHL seems to be obsessed with?

Quote from fhl:

It just goes to show you that people who believe it's natural for a man to stick his wang up another mans ass will believe just about anything.

stu · Nov 20, 2009

Quote from jem:

what facts do you have which refute her statement

He can create an evolutionary process that allows species to change and adapt.

facts are facts. You can not refute that statement without proving how the universe was created.

what facts do you have which refute this statement

He cannot create an evolutionary process that allows species to change and adapt.

facts are facts. You can not refute that statement without proving how the universe was created.

Quote from jem:

By the way I am not a Palin fan. I just get annoyed when "posters of science" make up shit about what science says.

By now you must be incandescently angry with yourself.

stu · Nov 20, 2009

Quote from fhl:

"Then you know that science proves evolution,"

-------------------------------------------------

Oh yeah, just like algore has proved man made global warming is a fact.
Oh no, science proves - is not the same as algore proves

And just like obama has proved himself to be a natural born citizen of the US.
just like science proves - is not the same as obama has proved

It just goes to show you that people who believe it's natural for a man to stick his wang up another mans ass will believe just about anything.
so you believe science proves is the same thing as algore or obama proves, then up where exactly is your own wang?
that is, presuming you have anything worth calling a wang

jem · Nov 20, 2009

Quote from stu:

what facts do you have which refute this statement

He cannot create an evolutionary process that allows species to change and adapt.

facts are facts. You can not refute that statement without proving how the universe was created.

By now you must be incandescently angry with yourself.

Stu you are such a child when it comes to faith.

One statement is virtually axiomatic which includes the name of God. (Implict in Palin's statement is the concept of "if God exits or I believe God is real" in that context Palins statement is self evident. )

Your statement limits the powers of God. Big deal?

Once again someone brings up God and you go nuts.

Try applying logic instead of your knee jerk emotions.

Kassz007 · Nov 20, 2009

Quote from jem:

I did not see her arguing that humans did or did not evolve from apes. Perhaps you were reading another thread.

She conveniently gets around that argument by saying god created evolution...

It's just like when I ask some religious people questions about god which they don't know the answer to. The response I get is usually something along the lines of "We as humans cannot understand why god does this and why god does that, only he knows because he is god." Total cop out...the worst part about it is most of them believe that shit.