Based on those stats, why isn't every wall st fund knocking on your door to hire you?
Exactly.
The claimed NQ Algo stats he posted above indicate a Share ratio of almost 8. Major redflag pointing to it being complete BS.
Last edited:
Based on those stats, why isn't every wall st fund knocking on your door to hire you?
Exactly.
The claimed NQ Algo stats he posted above indicate a Share ratio of almost 8. Major redflag pointing to it being complete BS.
But the weird thing is, as much as I hate this guy's zero risk attitude, that autostrat looks real, and I like it.
A Sharpe ratio of 8 looks real to you?
The only Algos that might do that kind of Sharpe Ratio of 8 are high frequency algos.
And his isn't high frequency.
A sharpe ratio of 'just' 3.0 for a non HFT algo is amazing, almost holy grail.
8 is just so off the charts, it is absurd to even think for one second that those stats are realistic.
Eyeballing the ladder
That's ridiculous, anyone can do this if they commit themselves. It takes a minimum of 50,000 plus hours of screen time.
And that is my issue I have with anything he posts. Stats don't jive with his rhetoric-shaw...... to endorse what I see from zero risk overnight-markets-always-goes-up man.
