Its the State of Mississippi that is accusing them,are you saying that the State of Mississippi and its people are anti white ?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Attention artful dodger, you missed a youth violence story today
- Thread starter AK Forty Seven
- Start date
Its the State of Mississippi that is accusing them,are you saying that the State of Mississippi and its people are anti white ?
Well in this case, the social constructs are the minority. They are in Jackson Mississippi, which I believe is about 75% black.
But no, I never said that I use that criteria where could you have possibly derived that?
But no, I never said that I use that criteria where could you have possibly derived that?
Quote from AK Forty Seven:
So you only post stories when the minority youths are convicted and admit that the crimes were racially motivated ?
No way man. That's a crazy exaggeration. In fact it's only 39 in 40 interracial crimes which are black-on-white vs white-on black. BUT for robbery you're actually short; blacks are 136 times as likely to rob a white person than vice versa.
"Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery."
2006, The Color of Crime.
http://www.colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.html
"Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery."
2006, The Color of Crime.
http://www.colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.html
Quote from denner:
Yeah, he might miss them because these stories are outnumbered by a factor of 100 to 1.
Check the homicide rate in any area of this country and get back to me with your findings.
What a fucking twerp you are.
Quote from Artful D0dger:
No way man. That's a crazy exaggeration. In fact it's only 39 in 40 interracial crimes which are black-on-white vs white-on black. BUT for robbery you're actually short; blacks are 136 times as likely to rob a white person than vice versa.
"Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery."
2006, The Color of Crime.
http://www.colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States#Characteristics_of_offenders
According to the latest "Hate Crimes Reported by Victims and Police," a 2008 Bureau of Justice Statistics Report, hate crime offenders were predominantly white (61%), whereas the victims were predominantly black (72.9%) and targeted because of their race (51%).
Certainly. Only white people get charged with "hate crimes". The DoJ even blatantly told it's prosecutors that it's not interested in prosecuting cases with white victims and nonwhite perpetrators. One high profile lawyer quit over it. Hate crime charges are only supposed to be for social constructs.
<iframe width="560" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/3y8V0-f14v4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Ex-Official Accuses Justice Department of Racial Bias in Black Panther Case
In emotional and personal testimony, an ex-Justice official who quit over the handling of a voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party accused his former employer of instructing attorneys in the civil rights division to ignore cases that involve black defendants and white victims.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...racial-bias-black-panther-case/#ixzz1RbwycvwJ
<iframe width="560" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/3y8V0-f14v4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Ex-Official Accuses Justice Department of Racial Bias in Black Panther Case
In emotional and personal testimony, an ex-Justice official who quit over the handling of a voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party accused his former employer of instructing attorneys in the civil rights division to ignore cases that involve black defendants and white victims.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...racial-bias-black-panther-case/#ixzz1RbwycvwJ
Quote from AK Forty Seven:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States#Characteristics_of_offenders
According to the latest "Hate Crimes Reported by Victims and Police," a 2008 Bureau of Justice Statistics Report, hate crime offenders were predominantly white (61%), whereas the victims were predominantly black (72.9%) and targeted because of their race (51%).
Quote from Artful D0dger:
Certainly. Only white people get charged with "hate crimes". The DoJ even blatantly told it's prosecutors that it's not interested in prosecuting cases with white victims and nonwhite perpetrators. One high profile lawyer quit over it. Hate crime charges are only supposed to be for social constructs.
<iframe width="560" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/3y8V0-f14v4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Ex-Official Accuses Justice Department of Racial Bias in Black Panther Case
In emotional and personal testimony, an ex-Justice official who quit over the handling of a voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party accused his former employer of instructing attorneys in the civil rights division to ignore cases that involve black defendants and white victims.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...racial-bias-black-panther-case/#ixzz1RbwycvwJ
Obama and Holder weren't even in office when this report was released
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States#Characteristics_of_offenders
According to the latest "Hate Crimes Reported by Victims and Police," a 2008 Bureau of Justice Statistics Report, hate crime offenders were predominantly white (61%), whereas the victims were predominantly black (72.9%) and targeted because of their race (51%).
Way to kill the straw man. Who ever mentioned Obama and Holder? I didn't. The protect the "youths" and indict the social constructs agenda is far older than the Obama administration, despite the actual facts:
Crime Rates
Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery.
When blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times more likely than non-blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely to use a knife.
Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly three times the white rate, and Asians commit violent crimes at about one quarter the white rate.
The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic.
Interracial Crime
Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.
Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.
Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.
Using the DoJ's own data.
http://www.colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.html
Crime Rates
Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery.
When blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times more likely than non-blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely to use a knife.
Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly three times the white rate, and Asians commit violent crimes at about one quarter the white rate.
The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic.
Interracial Crime
Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.
Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.
Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.
Using the DoJ's own data.
http://www.colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.html
Quote from AK Forty Seven:
Obama and Holder weren't even in office when this report was released
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States#Characteristics_of_offenders
According to the latest "Hate Crimes Reported by Victims and Police," a 2008 Bureau of Justice Statistics Report, hate crime offenders were predominantly white (61%), whereas the victims were predominantly black (72.9%) and targeted because of their race (51%).
It was about the DoJ's practices regarding the indictment of racial issues and hate crimes, not a particular administration. The practices have been around longer than the Obama administration.
But wait, you just said the case did NOT fall under Obama's administration. LOL! Make up your mind. You can't even agree with yourself about when it happened. However, no matter when it happened, it's irrelevant to my point: that the DoJ is not interested in cases with white victims and non white perps, as per the directive of it's own staff. This policy predates the Obama administration.
But wait, you just said the case did NOT fall under Obama's administration. LOL! Make up your mind. You can't even agree with yourself about when it happened. However, no matter when it happened, it's irrelevant to my point: that the DoJ is not interested in cases with white victims and non white perps, as per the directive of it's own staff. This policy predates the Obama administration.
Quote from AK Forty Seven:
Your post was about a case that fell under Obama and holders DOJ
Quote from Artful D0dger:
It was about the DoJ's practices regarding the indictment of racial issues and hate crimes, not a particular administration. The practices have been around longer than the Obama administration.
But wait, you just said the case did NOT fall under Obama's administration. LOL! Make up your mind. You can't even agree with yourself about when it happened. However, no matter when it happened, it's irrelevant to my point: that the DoJ is not interested in cases with white victims and non white perps, as per the directive of it's own staff. This policy predates the Obama administration.
So The DOJ is anti white ?