History has also not fully revealed the greatness of some people in the past.
It is just as logically possible that Jesus was actually greater than reported.
Given your doubting of history, it is logically possible to think that much of what Jesus did was not recorded, and that may have been his best work.
So logically, neither a negative nor a positive tone are warranted when there is a lack of direct evidence.
p.s. Virgin birth is possible today, Lesbians prove that, so who is to say that it was impossible then. We just don't know....
As an example, even without technology, a virgin woman could take some sperm and shove it up her vagina, stand on her head, and it is possible for that sperm to fertilize an egg.
So we don't know the stories of Virgin Birth or Resurrection are false, we just don't know them to be true.
The problem with atheists is they try to project as if they are being logical with their dogmatic position, but invariably they demonstrate what a closed minded position they actually have.
It is just as logically possible that Jesus was actually greater than reported.
Given your doubting of history, it is logically possible to think that much of what Jesus did was not recorded, and that may have been his best work.
So logically, neither a negative nor a positive tone are warranted when there is a lack of direct evidence.
p.s. Virgin birth is possible today, Lesbians prove that, so who is to say that it was impossible then. We just don't know....
As an example, even without technology, a virgin woman could take some sperm and shove it up her vagina, stand on her head, and it is possible for that sperm to fertilize an egg.
So we don't know the stories of Virgin Birth or Resurrection are false, we just don't know them to be true.
The problem with atheists is they try to project as if they are being logical with their dogmatic position, but invariably they demonstrate what a closed minded position they actually have.
Quote from vhehn:
we cant prove anything about jesus because there is no outside evidence. in fact there is no evidence outside the bible that jesus even existed although most skeptics will concede that a man named jesus probably existed and was killed by the romans.
what we are left with is deductive reasoning. we now know that the virgin birth story was a fable and we also know that the resurrection story was a fable made up by his followers. what we are left with is a simple jewish preacher who was killed by the romans and was later lifted to deity status by his followers.
it is somewhat like john kennedy. he was a flawed man who probably would not have even been reelected buy by being killed by an assassin was raised to hero status over time.
have you ever heard the saying" "those who write the history books control history"