Quote from Gabfly1:
Hardly. It is you Far Rightsters who are totally unwilling to look at the revenue side of the equation in the face of the obvious. First, the treasury is obliterated with trickle down, and now you want to fix it solely with spending cuts. Talk about a one-way agenda...
Nuff said. No, really.Quote from Kassz007:
1. I'm not a far rightster. I don't like taxes is all...
And what would be a suitable amount? Other than the ubiquitous "less?"Quote from Kassz007:
2. I've repeatedly stated that government needs taxes and revenue, just not as much as they currently extort...
"In general?" How decisively vague. Always a back door, eh? How about Canada? You want to talk about Canada's corporate tax rates compared to the rest of the G8 nations?Quote from Kassz007:
3. I was speaking about government in general, not the USA specifically. Why you turn every discussion into an American political one is beyond me...
Quote from Gabfly1:
Really? Including the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, whose analyses are based on the work of independent, nonpartisan authorities such as the Congressional Budget Office, the U.S. Census Bureau, and the Government Accountability Office? That "leftist shill site?"
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=165
Economists Across the Political Spectrum Reject Claims that Tax Cuts Pay for Themselves
While serious economists are divided on the question of whether and under what circumstances tax cuts are good for the economy, there is no such debate on the question of whether tax cuts pay for themselves. Economists from across the political spectrum reject the latter assertion.
In recent testimony before Congressâs Joint Economic Committee, Edward Lazear, current chairman of President Bushâs Council of Economic Advisors, stated, âI certainly would not claim that tax cuts pay for themselves.â
Keep those guns a-blazing, Sam.
Quote from Debaser82:
3 million box office.

Quote from marketsurfer:
People invest in movie projects for different reasons. Tax loss write-offs

Quote from Pekelo:
You are either exaggerating by 50%, or already added the worldwide take.![]()
Quote from Gabfly1:
Nuff said. No, really.
And what would be a suitable amount? Other than the
ubiquitous "less?"
"In general?" How decisively vague. Always a back door, eh? How about Canada? You want to talk about Canada's corporate tax rates compared to the rest of the G8 nations?