Atheists....whats your story?

Quote from CaptainObvious:

I hear ya'. Government money is much better spent on welfare queens spitting out kids every nine months. Maybe great social experiement in public education. How's about some free heath care for illegals.
Tell ya' what. When the government quits blowing my tax dollars supporting every f'n dead beat, I'll be in full support of your position. Until then, I'd rather the money be spent on a cross than on some shine with 15 kids who will then have 15 kids each and those will spit out 15 more each, and grandma is all of 29 years old.

You really know a lady who had 15 kids and each kid had 15 kids and the first lady is only 29, damn that's quite a story.
I see why you are for public funding of the cross making industry.
 
Quote from bigarrow:

You really know a lady who had 15 kids and each kid had 15 kids and the first lady is only 29, damn that's quite a story.
I see why you are for public funding of the cross making industry.

Take a trip through Chicago's southside. If you're lucky enough to make it out alive you'll see what's what. A 29 year old grandma is nothing unusual and 15 kids is conservative for the welfare queens.
 
Quote from CaptainObvious:

I hear ya'. Government money is much better spent on welfare queens spitting out kids every nine months. Maybe great social experiement in public education. How's about some free heath care for illegals.
Tell ya' what. When the government quits blowing my tax dollars supporting every f'n dead beat, I'll be in full support of your position. Until then, I'd rather the money be spent on a cross than on some shine with 15 kids who will then have 15 kids each and those will spit out 15 more each, and grandma is all of 29 years old.

I would rather see the money go to the kids then some useless cross. It's not their fault their parents are fucked up and leeching.
 
Quote from Kassz007:

I like it. As an atheist, I too would be outraged if my tax dollars were being spent on.......a giant cross? $20,000 to renovate a cross? Surely there are better uses for $20,000!

The church is already tax exempt... Not only do they not pay taxes, but they want to use those tax dollars as well?!

Pay for your own fucking cross, leeches.
Not to mention that the cross was an instrument of torture. A hell of a memento, eh?
 
Quote from Kassz007:

I would rather see the money go to the kids then some useless cross. It's not their fault their parents are fucked up and leeching.

That's the problem, it doesn't go to the kids. The money goes for a bag of dope, which goes in to a spoon which goes in to a syringe which gets stuck in mom's arm. Or it goes in to a slot machine at the boat, or some new bling, or in baby daddy's pocket for his habit. The kids grow up, all of 12-13 years old before they get in the game, it's the only life they know...rinse, wash, repeat.
20K wasted on a cross, or 20 billion wasted on parasites? Seems simple enough to me.
 
Quote from CaptainObvious:


20K wasted on a cross, or 20 billion wasted on parasites? Seems simple enough to me.

The way I see it is - 20K that is 100% sure to be a waste, or 20K that at least has a chance to be of use. Even if just $10 is spent on those kids to get them some pencils or something.
 
Quote from CaptainObvious:

Take a trip through Chicago's southside. If you're lucky enough to make it out alive you'll see what's what. A 29 year old grandma is nothing unusual and 15 kids is conservative for the welfare queens.

I'll pass on doing that. I've worked some insurance claims in slums in a few cities, I try to get my work done and out of those areas by lunch, that afternoon crowd is scary in the hood.
 
Every time I drive down Crenshaw in LA it's 7:00am. But I still have the Sig 229 at the ready.
:D


Quote from bigarrow:

I'll pass on doing that. I've worked some insurance claims in slums in a few cities, I try to get my work done and out of those areas by lunch, that afternoon crowd is scary in the hood.
 
Quote from PatternRec:

No stretch, fact. Unless you don't consider them to be "christians."

As for atheism killing people, well, that is illogical. Atheism itself isn't a principle, cause, philosophy, or belief system which people fight, die, or kill for. Unlike theism which uses gods and appeasement of gods for justification. Being killed by an atheist is no more being killed in the name of atheism than being killed by a fat person is being killed in the name of fatness.

So on that account, theism has killed more than any other ideology, cause, philosophy or belief system since men adopted religion.

"Atheist" means "without God". Godless ideologies, like communism, have been responsible for far more deaths than God-societies. Communists don't kill in the name of atheism; they kill in the name of communism. This still amounts to atheists engaging in mass murder in the name of atheist ideology.
 
If someone pointed out the logical flaws in your argument, would that cause you to rethink your argument?

Or would you just become hostile and belligerent and attack the messenger...

Quote from Hansel H:

"Atheist" means "without God". Godless ideologies, like communism, have been responsible for far more deaths than God-societies. Communists don't kill in the name of atheism; they kill in the name of communism. This still amounts to atheists engaging in mass murder in the name of atheist ideology.
 
Back
Top