My issue with atheism (a pursuit with great interest followed with devotion) is you want me to put faith in a religion that promotes
Nothing came from nothing to become something.
Nothing came from nothing to become something.
My issue with atheism (a pursuit with great interest followed with devotion) is you want me to put faith in a religion that promotes
Nothing came from nothing to become something.
My issue with atheism (a pursuit with great interest followed with devotion) is you want me to put faith in a religion that promotes
Nothing came from nothing to become something.
Nothing came from nothing to create algae to create everything.
How does evolution explain the masses on ET that still have the brains of algae ?
![]()
Naturally
of course
that's why they are natural forces![]()
Your issue is ill-informed.
Atheism is about the absence of faith and religion, not want of it. You might as well say lifeguards want you to drown due to the absence of drowning.
Yeah I know, the pretense that no faith is faith, is that ridiculous.
Science, not atheism, describes, how there is something rather than nothing.
Doesn't need faith, but scientific inquiry, discovery and knowledge about the physical world.
I can see the headlines now...
BREAKING NEWS
No Evolution! God Is Why ET Masses Have Algae Brains.
good luck with that one.
Is this the same science that wants me to believe and place faith in unproven assumptions in the Big Bang theory ?
So how is science any different from religion when you want me to accept assumptions as truth without any proof?
So how is science any different from religion when you want me to accept assumptions as truth without any proof?