Quote from BernardRichards:
Prove what with observable evidence plus how can I argue with a sophist who engages in the logical fallacy of ad hominem.
You want to bash Christianity? You want to bash Islam? You want to bash Judaism? You want to bash Hinduism, Buddhism, theism, etc. ?
Then go ahead. What do you want from me?
Please continue your sophistry without me or I will have no choice, but to place you on my cretins, perverts, and degenerate list i.e., ignore list. I usually don't put sophists on it unless they don't get the message that I don't wish to interact with them in which case I think that they have transcended the boundary from just a plain sophist to a degenerate sophist so they belong on that list.
be my guest. this country is in enough trouble without the willful ignorance of someone like you gaining traction. that someone could actually make this statement and believe it makes me fear for our future:
"The mathematical and metaphysical proofs are much stronger. Aristotle 2,300 years ago could prove that a creator must exist, and his proof is stronger than that of any scientific proof right now so could Newton and Pascal proof that a creator must exist based on pure logic."